Suppr超能文献

《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版人格量表反应不一致性量表的编制

Development of a Response Inconsistency Scale for the Personality Inventory for DSM-5.

作者信息

Keeley Jared W, Webb Christopher, Peterson Destiny, Roussin Lindsey, Flanagan Elizabeth H

机构信息

a Department of Psychology , Mississippi State University.

b Department of Psychiatry , Yale University.

出版信息

J Pers Assess. 2016 Jul-Aug;98(4):351-9. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2016.1158719. Epub 2016 Apr 6.

Abstract

The advent of a dimensional model of personality disorder included in DSM-5 has necessitated the development of a new measurement scheme, specifically a self-report questionnaire termed the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5; Krueger, Derringer, Markon, Watson, & Skodol, 2012 ). However, there are many threats to the validity of a self-report measure, including response inconsistency. This study outlines the development of an inconsistency scale for the PID-5. Across both college student and clinical samples, the inconsistency scale was able to reliably differentiate real from random responding. Random responses led to increased scores on the PID-5 facets, indicating the importance of detecting inconsistent responding prior to test interpretation. Thus, this inconsistency scale could be of use to researchers and clinicians in detecting inconsistent responses to this new personality disorder measure.

摘要

《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM - 5)中所包含的人格障碍维度模型的出现,使得开发一种新的测量方案成为必要,具体而言,是一种名为《DSM - 5人格问卷》(PID - 5;克鲁格、德林杰、马孔、沃森和斯科多尔,2012年)的自陈问卷。然而,自陈测量的效度存在诸多威胁,包括反应不一致。本研究概述了PID - 5不一致性量表的开发过程。在大学生样本和临床样本中,不一致性量表都能够可靠地区分真实反应和随机反应。随机反应导致PID - 5各维度得分增加,这表明在测试解读之前检测不一致反应的重要性。因此,这种不一致性量表可能对研究人员和临床医生检测对这种新的人格障碍测量方法的不一致反应有用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验