John Seby, Hazaa Walaa, Uchino Ken, Toth Gabor, Bain Mark, Thebo Umera, Hussain Muhammad S
Cerebrovascular Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Department of Internal Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Interv Neurol. 2016 Mar;4(3-4):151-7. doi: 10.1159/000444098. Epub 2016 Feb 25.
It is unknown if intraprocedural blood pressure (BP) influences clinical outcomes and what BP parameter best predicts outcomes in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients who undergo intra-arterial therapy (IAT) for emergent large vessel occlusion.
We retrospectively reviewed 147 patients who underwent IAT for anterior circulation AIS from January 2008 to December 2012 at our institution. Baseline demographics, stroke treatment variables, and detailed intraprocedural hemodynamic variables were collected.
The entire cohort consisted of 81 (55%) females with a mean age of 66.9 ± 15.6 years and a median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score of 16 (IQR 11-21). Thirty-six (24.5%) patients died during hospitalization, 25 (17%) achieved a 30-day modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2, and 24 (16.3%) suffered symptomatic parenchymal hematoma type 1/2 hemorrhage. Patients who achieved a good outcome had a significantly lower admission NIHSS score, a higher baseline CT ASPECTS score, and a lower rate of ICA terminus occlusions. Successful recanalization was more frequent in the good-outcome group, while symptomatic hemorrhages occurred only in poor-outcome patients. The first systolic BP (SBP; 146.5 ± 0.2 vs. 157.7 ± 25.6 mm Hg, p = 0.042), first mean arterial pressure (MAP; 98.1 ± 20.8 vs. 109.7 ± 20.3 mm Hg, p = 0.024), maximum SBP (164.6 ± 27.6 vs. 180.9 ± 18.3 mm Hg, p = 0.0003), and maximum MAP (125.5 ± 18.6 vs. 138.5 ± 24.6 mm Hg, p = 0.0309) were all significantly lower in patients who achieved good outcomes. A lower maximum intraprocedural SBP was an independent predictor of good outcome (adjusted OR 0.929, 95% CI 0.886-0.963, p = 0.0005). Initial NIHSS score was the only other independent predictor of a good outcome.
Lower intraprocedural SBP was associated with good outcome in patients undergoing IAT for AIS, and maximum SBP was an independent predictor of good outcome. SBP may be the optimal hemodynamic variable to monitor intraprocedurally during IAT and may predict outcome.
对于接受动脉内治疗(IAT)以治疗急性大血管闭塞性缺血性卒中(AIS)的患者,术中血压(BP)是否会影响临床结局以及何种BP参数能最佳预测结局尚不清楚。
我们回顾性分析了2008年1月至2012年12月在我院接受IAT治疗前循环AIS的147例患者。收集了基线人口统计学资料、卒中治疗变量及详细的术中血流动力学变量。
整个队列包括81例(55%)女性,平均年龄66.9±15.6岁,美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)评分中位数为16(四分位间距11 - 21)。36例(24.5%)患者在住院期间死亡,25例(17%)30天改良Rankin量表评分为0 - 2分,24例(16.3%)发生有症状的实质内血肿1/2型出血。预后良好的患者入院时NIHSS评分显著更低,基线CT ASPECTS评分更高,颈内动脉末端闭塞率更低。良好预后组成功再通更常见,而有症状出血仅发生在预后不良的患者中。预后良好的患者首次收缩压(SBP;146.5±0.2 vs. 157.7±25.6 mmHg,p = 0.042)、首次平均动脉压(MAP;98.1±20.8 vs. 109.7±20.3 mmHg,p = 0.024)、最高SBP(164.6±27.6 vs. 180.9±18.3 mmHg,p = 0.0003)和最高MAP(125.5±18.6 vs. 138.5±24.6 mmHg,p = 0.0309)均显著更低。术中最高SBP更低是良好预后的独立预测因素(校正OR 0.929,95%CI 0.886 - 0.963,p = 0.0005)。初始NIHSS评分是良好预后的唯一其他独立预测因素。
对于接受IAT治疗AIS的患者,术中较低的SBP与良好预后相关,最高SBP是良好预后的独立预测因素。SBP可能是IAT术中监测的最佳血流动力学变量,且可能预测结局。