Yin Ming, Joshi Monika, Meijer Richard P, Glantz Michael, Holder Sheldon, Harvey Harold A, Kaag Matthew, Fransen van de Putte Elisabeth E, Horenblas Simon, Drabick Joseph J
Department of Hematology and Oncology, Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA.
Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Department of Urology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Oncologist. 2016 Jun;21(6):708-15. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0440. Epub 2016 Apr 6.
Platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been shown to improve survival outcomes in muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to provide updated results of previous findings. We also summarized published data to compare clinical outcomes of methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MVAC) versus gemcitabine and cisplatin/carboplatin (GC) in the neoadjuvant setting.
A meta-analysis of 15 randomized clinical trials was performed to compare neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus local treatment with the same local treatment alone. Because no randomized trials have investigated MVAC versus GC in the neoadjuvant setting, a meta-analysis of 13 retrospective studies was performed to compare MVAC with GC.
A total of 3,285 patients were included in 15 randomized clinical trials. There was a significant overall survival (OS) benefit associated with cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR], 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79-0.96). A total of 1,766 patients were included in 13 retrospective studies. There was no significant difference in pathological complete response between MVAC and GC. However, GC was associated with a significantly reduced overall survival (HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.01-1.57). After excluding carboplatin data, GC still seemed to be inferior to MVAC in OS (HR, 1.31; 95% CI, 0.99-1.74), but the difference was no longer statistically significant.
These results support the use of cisplatin-based combination neoadjuvant chemotherapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Although GC and MVAC had similar treatment response rates, the different survival outcome observed in this study requires further investigation.
Platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) has been shown to improve survival outcomes in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) patients, but the optimal neoadjuvant regimen has not been established. Methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MVAC) and gemcitabine and cisplatin/carboplatin (GC) are two of the most commonly used chemotherapy regimens in modern oncology. In this two-step meta-analysis, an updated and more precise estimate of the survival benefit of cisplatin-based NCT in MIBC is provided. This study also demonstrated that MVAC might have superior overall survival compared with GC (with or without carboplatin data) in the neoadjuvant setting. The findings suggest that NCT should be standard care in MIBC, and MVAC could be the preferred neoadjuvant regimen.
铂类新辅助化疗已被证明可改善肌层浸润性膀胱癌患者的生存结局。我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以提供先前研究结果的更新数据。我们还总结了已发表的数据,以比较甲氨蝶呤、长春碱、阿霉素和顺铂(MVAC)与吉西他滨和顺铂/卡铂(GC)在新辅助治疗中的临床结局。
进行了一项对15项随机临床试验的荟萃分析,以比较新辅助化疗联合局部治疗与单纯局部治疗的效果。由于尚无随机试验研究新辅助治疗中MVAC与GC的疗效,因此进行了一项对13项回顾性研究的荟萃分析,以比较MVAC与GC。
15项随机临床试验共纳入3285例患者。基于顺铂的新辅助化疗具有显著的总生存(OS)获益(风险比[HR],0.87;95%置信区间[CI],0.79 - 0.96)。13项回顾性研究共纳入1766例患者。MVAC与GC的病理完全缓解率无显著差异。然而,GC与总生存率显著降低相关(HR,1.26;95%CI,1.01 - 1.57)。排除卡铂数据后,GC在总生存方面似乎仍不如MVAC(HR,1.31;95%CI,0.99 - 1.74),但差异不再具有统计学意义。
这些结果支持在肌层浸润性膀胱癌中使用基于顺铂的联合新辅助化疗。尽管GC和MVAC的治疗反应率相似,但本研究中观察到的不同生存结局需要进一步研究。
铂类新辅助化疗(NCT)已被证明可改善肌层浸润性膀胱癌(MIBC)患者的生存结局,但最佳新辅助治疗方案尚未确定。甲氨蝶呤、长春碱、阿霉素和顺铂(MVAC)以及吉西他滨和顺铂/卡铂(GC)是现代肿瘤学中最常用的两种化疗方案。在这项两步荟萃分析中,提供了对基于顺铂的NCT在MIBC中生存获益的更新且更精确的估计。本研究还表明,在新辅助治疗中,MVAC可能比GC(无论有无卡铂数据)具有更好的总生存。研究结果表明,NCT应成为MIBC的标准治疗,MVAC可能是首选的新辅助治疗方案。