Tupper-Carey Darell Alexander, Fathil Shahridan Mohd, Tan Yin Kiat Glenn, Kan Yuk Man, Cheong Chern Yuen, Siddiqui Fahad Javaid, Assam Pryseley Nkouibert
Department of Anaesthesia, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, JurongHealth, Singapore.
Department of Surgery, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, JurongHealth, Singapore.
Singapore Med J. 2017 Aug;58(8):481-487. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2016068. Epub 2016 Apr 8.
We conducted a single-centre, prospective randomised clinical trial to investigate the analgesic efficacy of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in adult patients undergoing laparoscopic appendicectomy.
Patients undergoing urgent laparoscopic appendicectomy under general anaesthesia alone (control group) and general anaesthesia supplemented by TAP block (TAP intervention group) were compared. All patients received a multimodal analgesia regime, which included postoperative morphine via a patient-controlled analgesia device. The primary endpoints were morphine consumption at 12 hours and 24 hours postoperatively. Secondary endpoints included pain scores, incidence of nausea and vomiting, and time to hospital discharge. A total of 58 patients were recruited, with 29 patients in each group.
Mean postoperative morphine consumption at 12 hours (control group: 11.45 ± 7.64 mg, TAP intervention group: 9.79 ± 8.09 mg; p = 0.4264) and 24 hours (control group: 13.38 ± 8.72 mg, TAP intervention group: 11.31 ± 8.66 mg; p = 0.3686) for the control and TAP intervention groups were not statistically different. Secondary outcomes were also not different between the two groups. Length of stay in the post-anaesthesia care unit was significantly shorter for the TAP intervention group, with a trend toward faster hospital discharge being observed.
TAP block, a regional anaesthetic procedure performed immediately prior to skin incision for laparoscopic appendicectomy, did not significantly improve postoperative analgesia outcomes.
我们进行了一项单中心前瞻性随机临床试验,以研究腹横肌平面(TAP)阻滞对接受腹腔镜阑尾切除术的成年患者的镇痛效果。
比较仅接受全身麻醉的急诊腹腔镜阑尾切除术患者(对照组)和接受全身麻醉并辅以TAP阻滞的患者(TAP干预组)。所有患者均接受多模式镇痛方案,其中包括通过患者自控镇痛装置术后使用吗啡。主要终点是术后12小时和24小时的吗啡消耗量。次要终点包括疼痛评分、恶心和呕吐发生率以及出院时间。共招募了58例患者,每组29例。
对照组和TAP干预组术后12小时(对照组:11.45±7.64毫克,TAP干预组:9.79±8.09毫克;p = 0.4264)和24小时(对照组:13.38±8.72毫克,TAP干预组:11.31±8.66毫克;p = 0.3686)的平均吗啡消耗量无统计学差异。两组的次要结局也无差异。TAP干预组在麻醉后护理单元的住院时间明显更短,观察到有更快出院的趋势。
TAP阻滞是一种在腹腔镜阑尾切除术皮肤切口前立即进行的区域麻醉操作,并未显著改善术后镇痛效果。