Wang Erica T, Ozimek John A, Greene Naomi, Ramos Lauren, Vyas Nina, Kilpatrick Sarah J, Pisarska Margareta D
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
Fertil Steril. 2016 Aug;106(2):423-6. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.03.039. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
To determine if fertility treatment is associated with increased risk of severe maternal morbidity (SMM) compared with spontaneous pregnancies.
Retrospective cohort study.
Academic medical center.
PATIENT(S): In 2012, 6,543 women delivered live births >20 weeks gestation at our center. Women were categorized based on mode of conception: in vitro fertilization (IVF), non-IVF fertility treatment (NIFT), or spontaneous pregnancies.
INTERVENTION(S): None.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The main outcome was presence of true SMM, such as eclampsia, respiratory failure, and peripartum hysterectomy. Deliveries were screened with the use of: 1) International Classification of Diseases 9 codes; 2) prolonged postpartum stay; 3) maternal intensive care unit admissions, and 4) blood transfusion. The charts of women meeting the screening criteria were reviewed to identify true SMM based on a previously validated method, recognizing that medical record review is the criterion standard.
RESULT(S): Of the 6,543 deliveries, 246 (3.8%) were IVF conceptions and 109 (1.7%) NIFT conceptions. Sixty-nine cases of true SMM were identified (1.1%). In multivariate analyses, any fertility treatment (IVF + NIFT) was associated with increased risk of SMM compared with spontaneous conceptions. In a subset analysis of singletons only, the association between any fertility treatment (IVF + NIFT) and SMM was not statistically significant.
CONCLUSION(S): Overall, fertility treatment increased risk for SMM events. Given the limited sample size, the negative finding with singleton gestations is inconclusive. Larger multicenter studies with accurate documentation of fertility treatment and SMM cases are needed to further clarify the risk associated with singletons.
确定与自然受孕相比,辅助生殖治疗是否会增加严重孕产妇发病(SMM)的风险。
回顾性队列研究。
学术医疗中心。
2012年,6543名在本中心分娩孕周>20周活产婴儿的女性。根据受孕方式对女性进行分类:体外受精(IVF)、非体外受精辅助生殖治疗(NIFT)或自然受孕。
无。
主要观察指标为真正的SMM的存在情况,如子痫、呼吸衰竭和产后子宫切除术。通过以下方式筛选分娩情况:1)国际疾病分类第9版编码;2)产后住院时间延长;3)产妇入住重症监护病房;4)输血。对符合筛选标准的女性病历进行审查,以根据先前验证的方法确定真正的SMM,同时认识到病历审查是标准规范。
在6543例分娩中,246例(3.8%)为IVF受孕,109例(1.7%)为NIFT受孕。共确定69例真正的SMM病例(1.1%)。在多变量分析中,与自然受孕相比,任何辅助生殖治疗(IVF + NIFT)都与SMM风险增加相关。在仅对单胎妊娠的亚组分析中,任何辅助生殖治疗(IVF + NIFT)与SMM之间的关联无统计学意义。
总体而言,辅助生殖治疗增加了SMM事件的风险。鉴于样本量有限,单胎妊娠的阴性结果尚无定论。需要开展更大规模的多中心研究,准确记录辅助生殖治疗和SMM病例,以进一步阐明单胎妊娠相关风险。