Ekama Ilesanmi Rose, Morohunfoluwa Oluwatosin Odunayo
Ostomy Wound Manage. 2016 Apr;62(4):30-40.
Educational intervention programs are an important element to improve nurses' knowledge of pressure ulcer (PU) prevention. Various teaching methods have been used with diverse results but none have been analyzed in Nigeria. A quasi- experimental study using a pretest/post test design was conducted among 193 registered nurses with >6 months experience who worked in purposefully selected wards (neuroscience, orthopedics, renal, and cardiac) in 3 teaching hospitals to examine the level of knowledge retention after interactive instruction. Participants were randomized to intervention (IG, n = 127 from 2 hospitals) and control (CG, n = 66 from 1 hospital) groups; the IG was provided a 5-day, face-to-face interactive lecture, and the CG engaged in a 1-day, 4-hour discussion of PU prevention practices. The Pressure Ulcer Knowledge Tool, a 47-item questionnaire in which a correct answer = 1 point and an incorrect/"I don't know" answer = 0 (maximum score 47), was used to assess and compare knowledge retention at 3 time points: baseline (T1), immediately after instruction (T2), and after 3 months (T3). Three trained research assistants assisted with registration of participants and distribution and collection of the questionnaires. All questionnaires were retrieved at T1 before the intervention be- gan. Respondents were encouraged to respond to all questions. Data were analyzed using t-test and ANOVA (P = 0.05). At T1, knowledge scores were comparable between the IG and CG (32.5 ± 4.2 and 30.8 ± 5.0 for IG and CG, respectively). At T2, knowledge scores increased significantly only in the IG to 40.7 ± 3.4 (d = 1.94, P less than 0.05). The mean difference between T1 and T2 was -8.2 ± 5.4, t = -17.0, P = 0.000. Similarly, mean scores increased significantly from T2 to T3 in the IG (mean= -2.0 ± 5.5, t = -4.1, P = 0.000); scores in the CG were -6.2 ± 7.2, t = -6.3 (P = 0.000). A face-to-face interactive lecture was shown to be an effective method of program delivery for nurses; other educational methods should be assessed and their effects on PU prevention practices and outcomes evaluated.
教育干预项目是提高护士预防压疮(PU)知识的重要因素。人们使用了各种教学方法,结果各不相同,但在尼日利亚尚未对这些方法进行分析。我们采用前测/后测设计进行了一项准实验研究,研究对象为193名在3家教学医院中特意挑选的病房(神经科、骨科、肾科和心脏科)工作且有超过6个月工作经验的注册护士,目的是检验互动式教学后知识保留的水平。参与者被随机分为干预组(IG,来自2家医院,n = 127)和对照组(CG,来自1家医院,n = 66);干预组接受了为期5天的面对面互动讲座,对照组参加了为期1天、时长4小时的关于PU预防实践的讨论。使用压疮知识工具(一份包含47个条目的问卷,正确答案计1分,错误答案或“我不知道”答案计0分,最高分为47分)在3个时间点评估和比较知识保留情况:基线(T1)、教学结束后即刻(T2)以及3个月后(T3)。三名经过培训的研究助理协助参与者登记以及问卷的发放和收集。在干预开始前的T1时间点收回了所有问卷。鼓励受访者回答所有问题。使用t检验和方差分析(P = 0.05)对数据进行分析。在T1时,干预组和对照组的知识得分具有可比性(干预组为32.5 ± 4.2,对照组为30.8 ± 5.0)。在T2时,仅干预组的知识得分显著提高至40.7 ± 3.4(d = 1.94,P < 0.05)。T1和T2之间的平均差值为 -8.2 ± 5.4,t = -17.0,P = 0.000。同样,干预组的平均得分从T2到T3显著提高(平均值 = -2.0 ± 5.5,t = -4.1,P = 0.000);对照组的得分是 -6.2 ± 7.2,t = -6.3(P = 0.000)。结果表明,面对面互动讲座是一种对护士有效的项目授课方法;应该评估其他教育方法,并评价它们对PU预防实践和结果的影响。