Milet-Pinheiro Paulo, Herz Kerstin, Dötterl Stefan, Ayasse Manfred
Institute of Evolutionary Ecology and Conservation Genomics, University of Ulm, Helmholtzstraße 10-1, 89081, Ulm, Germany.
Departamento de Química Fundamental, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Av. Prof. Moraes Rego, s/n, Recife, 50670-901, Brazil.
BMC Ecol. 2016 Apr 11;16:20. doi: 10.1186/s12898-016-0074-z.
Many insects have multiple generations per year and cohorts emerging in different seasons may evolve their own phenotypes if they are subjected to different selection regimes. The bivoltine bee Andrena bicolor is reported to be polylectic and oligolectic (on Campanula) in the spring and summer generations, respectively. Neurological constraints are assumed to govern pollen diet in bees. However, evidence comes predominantly from studies with oligolectic bees. We have investigated how sensory constraints influence the innate foraging behavior of A. bicolor and have tested whether bees of different generations evolved behavioral and sensory polyphenism to cope better with the host flowers available in nature when they are active.
Behavioral and sensory polyphenisms were tested in choice assays and electroantennographic analyses, respectively. In the bioassays, we found that females of both generations (1) displayed a similar innate relative reliance on visual and olfactory floral cues irrespective of the host plants tested; (2) did not prefer floral cues of Campanula to those of Taraxacum (or vice versa) and (3) did not display an innate preference for yellow and lilac colors. In the electroantennographic analyses, we found that bees of both generations responded to the same set of compounds.
Overall, we did not detect seasonal polyphenism in any trait examined. The finding that bees of both generations are not sensory constrained to visit a specific host flower, which is in strict contrast to results from studies with oligolectic bees, suggest that also bees of the second generation have a flexibility in innate foraging behavior and that this is an adaptive trait in A. bicolor. We discuss the significance of our findings in context of the natural history of A. bicolor and in the broader context of host-range evolution in bees.
许多昆虫每年有多个世代,如果处于不同的选择机制下,不同季节出现的种群可能会进化出各自的表型。据报道,双季蜜蜂双色地蜂在春季和夏季世代分别为多食性和寡食性(以风铃草属植物为食)。神经学限制被认为决定了蜜蜂的花粉饮食。然而,证据主要来自对寡食性蜜蜂的研究。我们研究了感官限制如何影响双色地蜂的先天觅食行为,并测试了不同世代的蜜蜂是否进化出行为和感官多型现象,以便在它们活跃时更好地应对自然界中可获得的寄主花朵。
分别在选择试验和触角电图分析中测试了行为和感官多型现象。在生物测定中,我们发现两代雌性(1)无论测试的寄主植物如何,都表现出对视觉和嗅觉花卉线索相似的先天相对依赖;(2)对风铃草属植物的花卉线索并不比对蒲公英属植物的花卉线索更偏好(反之亦然),并且(3)对黄色和淡紫色没有先天偏好。在触角电图分析中,我们发现两代蜜蜂对同一组化合物都有反应。
总体而言,我们在所检查的任何性状中都未检测到季节性多型现象。两代蜜蜂在感官上都不受限于访问特定的寄主花朵,这一发现与对寡食性蜜蜂的研究结果形成了鲜明对比,表明第二代蜜蜂在先天觅食行为上也具有灵活性,这是双色地蜂的一种适应性特征。我们在双色地蜂的自然史背景以及蜜蜂寄主范围进化的更广泛背景下讨论了我们研究结果的意义。