Thomas Biju, Chay Oh Moh, Allen John C, Chiang Andrea Shu Xian, Pugalenthi Arun, Goh Anne, Wong Petrina, Teo Ai Huay, Tan Soh Gin, Teoh Oon Hoe
Department of Pediatric Respiratory Medicine, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, 100 Bukit Timah Road, Singapore 229899, Singapore.
Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapore 169857, Singapore.
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2016 Oct;51(10):1004-1009. doi: 10.1002/ppul.23426. Epub 2016 Apr 13.
Previous studies on association between level of asthma control, markers of airway inflammation and the degree of bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) have yielded conflicting results. Our aim was to determine the presence and severity of BHR and the concordance between BHR, asthma control, and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) in children with asthma on therapy.
In this cross-sectional observational study, children (aged 6-18 years) with asthma on British Thoracic Society (BTS) treatment steps 2 or 3, underwent comprehensive assessment of their asthma control (clinical assessment, spirometry, asthma control test [ACT], Pediatric Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire [PAQLQ]), measurement of FeNO and BHR (using mannitol dry powder bronchial challenge test [MCT], Aridol™, Pharmaxis, Australia).
Fifty-seven children (63% male) were studied. Twenty-seven children were on BTS treatment step 2 and 30 were on step 3. Overall, 25 out of 57 (43.8%) children had positive MCT. Of note, 9 out of 27 (33.3%) children with clinically controlled asthma had positive MCT. Analyses of pair-wise agreement between MCT (positive or negative), FeNO (>25 or ≤25 ppb) and clinical assessment of asthma control (controlled or partially controlled/uncontrolled) showed poor agreement between these measures.
A substantial proportion of children with asthma have persistent BHR despite good clinical control. The concordance between clinical assessment of asthma control, BHR and FeNO was observed to be poor. Our findings raise concerns in the context of emerging evidence for the role of bronchoconstriction in inducing epithelial stress that may drive airway remodeling in asthma. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2016;51:1004-1009. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
先前关于哮喘控制水平、气道炎症标志物与支气管高反应性(BHR)程度之间关联的研究结果相互矛盾。我们的目的是确定接受治疗的哮喘儿童中BHR的存在及严重程度,以及BHR、哮喘控制和呼出一氧化氮分数(FeNO)之间的一致性。
在这项横断面观察性研究中,处于英国胸科学会(BTS)治疗第2或3步的6至18岁哮喘儿童接受了哮喘控制的全面评估(临床评估、肺功能测定、哮喘控制测试[ACT]、儿童哮喘生活质量问卷[PAQLQ])、FeNO测定以及BHR测定(使用甘露醇干粉支气管激发试验[MCT],Aridol™,澳大利亚Pharmaxis公司)。
共研究了57名儿童(63%为男性)。27名儿童处于BTS治疗第2步,30名处于第3步。总体而言,57名儿童中有25名(43.8%)MCT结果为阳性。值得注意的是,27名临床控制良好的哮喘儿童中有9名(33.3%)MCT结果为阳性。对MCT(阳性或阴性)、FeNO(>25或≤25 ppb)与哮喘控制临床评估(控制或部分控制/未控制)之间的两两一致性分析显示,这些指标之间的一致性较差。
尽管临床控制良好,但仍有相当比例的哮喘儿童存在持续性BHR。观察到哮喘控制临床评估、BHR和FeNO之间的一致性较差。鉴于支气管收缩在诱导上皮应激从而可能推动哮喘气道重塑中所起作用的新证据不断涌现,我们的研究结果引发了关注。《儿科肺病学》。2016年;51:1004 - 1009。©2016威利期刊公司。