Martin Amber L, Marvel Jessica, Fahrbach Kyle, Cadarette Sarah M, Wilcox Teresa K, Donohue James F
Evidera, 430 Bedford Street, Suite 300, 02420, Lexington, MA, USA.
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA.
Respir Res. 2016 Apr 16;17:40. doi: 10.1186/s12931-016-0356-1.
This study investigated the relationship between changes in lung function (as measured by forced expiratory volume in one second [FEV1]) and the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) and economically significant outcomes of exacerbations and health resource utilization, with an aim to provide insight into whether the effects of COPD treatment on lung function and health status relate to a reduced risk for exacerbations.
A systematic literature review was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to identify randomized controlled trials of adult COPD patients published in English since 2002 in order to relate mean change in FEV1 and SGRQ total score to exacerbations and hospitalizations. These predictor/outcome pairs were analyzed using sample-size weighted regression analyses, which estimated a regression slope relating the two treatment effects, as well as a confidence interval and a test of statistical significance.
Sixty-seven trials were included in the analysis. Significant relationships were seen between: FEV1 and any exacerbation (time to first exacerbation or patients with at least one exacerbation, p = 0.001); between FEV1 and moderate-to-severe exacerbations (time to first exacerbation, patients with at least one exacerbation, or annualized rate, p = 0.045); between SGRQ score and any exacerbation (time to first exacerbation or patients with at least one exacerbation, p = 0.0002) and between SGRQ score and moderate-to-severe exacerbations (time to first exacerbation or patients with at least one exacerbation, p = 0.0279; annualized rate, p = 0.0024). Relationships between FEV1 or SGRQ score and annualized exacerbation rate for any exacerbation or hospitalized exacerbations were not significant.
The regression analysis demonstrated a significant association between improvements in FEV1 and SGRQ score and lower risk for COPD exacerbations. Even in cases of non-significant relationships, results were in the expected direction with few exceptions. The results of this analysis offer health care providers and payers a broader picture of the relationship between exacerbations and mean change in FEV1 as well as SGRQ score, and will help inform clinical and formulary-making decisions while stimulating new research questions for future prospective studies.
本研究调查了肺功能变化(通过一秒用力呼气容积[FEV1]测量)与圣乔治呼吸问卷(SGRQ)之间的关系,以及急性加重和卫生资源利用的经济显著结果,旨在深入了解慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)治疗对肺功能和健康状况的影响是否与降低急性加重风险相关。
在MEDLINE、Embase和Cochrane对照试验中央注册库中进行了系统的文献综述,以识别自2002年以来以英文发表的成人COPD患者的随机对照试验,以便将FEV1的平均变化和SGRQ总分与急性加重和住院情况相关联。使用样本量加权回归分析对这些预测因素/结果对进行分析,该分析估计了两个治疗效果之间的回归斜率,以及置信区间和统计显著性检验。
67项试验纳入分析。观察到以下显著关系:FEV1与任何急性加重(首次急性加重时间或至少有一次急性加重的患者,p = 0.001);FEV1与中重度急性加重(首次急性加重时间、至少有一次急性加重的患者或年化率,p = 0.045);SGRQ评分与任何急性加重(首次急性加重时间或至少有一次急性加重的患者,p = 0.0002)以及SGRQ评分与中重度急性加重(首次急性加重时间或至少有一次急性加重的患者,p = 0.0279;年化率,p = 0.0024)。FEV1或SGRQ评分与任何急性加重或住院急性加重的年化急性加重率之间的关系不显著。
回归分析表明,FEV1和SGRQ评分的改善与COPD急性加重风险降低之间存在显著关联。即使在关系不显著的情况下,结果也大多在预期方向,仅有少数例外。本分析结果为医疗保健提供者和付款人提供了急性加重与FEV1以及SGRQ评分平均变化之间关系的更全面情况,并将有助于为临床和处方制定决策提供信息,同时激发未来前瞻性研究的新问题。