Finston Susan K, Davey Neil S, Davé Elina, Ravichandran Varsha, Davey Sonya R, Davé Raj S
Finston Consulting, LLC, 3414 30th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20008-3250, USA.
Harvard College, 60 Linnaean Street, 144 Cabot, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
Pharm Pat Anal. 2016 May;5(3):159-67. doi: 10.4155/ppa-2016-0005. Epub 2016 Apr 18.
This paper discusses how the United States biopharmaceutical market has been affected by recent changes in patent law resulting from United States legislations (Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act and the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act) and Supreme Court precedents (Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. and Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics). The authors interviewed eight key opinion leaders from the United States knowledgeable in biopharmaceuticals, including industry veterans, patent counsel, senior scientists and jurists. This paper summarizes the opinions of the key opinion leaders. This paper explains the impact of these Supreme Court decisions - i.e., broadening the exceptions to patent eligibility for law of nature and natural phenomenon - on biopharmaceutical innovations and provides future perspectives.
本文探讨了美国生物制药市场如何受到美国立法(《生物制品价格竞争与创新法案》和《莱希-史密斯美国发明法案》)以及最高法院先例(梅奥协作服务公司诉普罗米修斯实验室公司案和分子病理学协会诉麦利亚德基因公司案)所导致的专利法近期变化的影响。作者采访了八位来自美国的在生物制药领域知识渊博的关键意见领袖,包括行业资深人士、专利顾问、资深科学家和法学家。本文总结了这些关键意见领袖的观点。本文解释了这些最高法院判决——即扩大对自然法则和自然现象的专利适格性的例外情况——对生物制药创新的影响,并提供了未来展望。