Jonas Oliver, Oudin Madeleine J, Kosciuk Tatsiana, Whitman Matthew, Gertler Frank B, Cima Michael J, Flaherty Keith T, Langer Robert
David H. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Division of Surgical Oncology, Medical Oncology and Dermatology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Dec 15;22(24):6031-6038. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-2722. Epub 2016 Apr 18.
Treatment of BRAF-mutated melanoma tumors with BRAF inhibitor-based therapy produces high response rates, but of limited duration in the vast majority of patients. Published investigations of resistance mechanisms suggest numerous examples of tumor adaptation and signal transduction bypass mechanisms, but without insight into biomarkers that would predict which mechanism will predominate. Monitoring phenotypic response of multiple adaptive mechanisms simultaneously within the same tumor as it adapts during treatment has been elusive.
This study reports on a method to provide a more complete understanding of adaptive tumor responses. We simultaneously measured in vivo antitumor activity of 12 classes of inhibitors, which are suspected of enabling adaptive escape mechanisms, at various time points during systemic BRAF inhibition. We used implantable microdevices to release multiple compounds into distinct regions of a tumor to measure the efficacy of each compound independently and repeated these measurements as tumors progressed on systemic BRAF treatment.
We observed varying phenotypic responses to specific inhibitors before, during, and after prolonged systemic treatment with BRAF inhibitors. Our results specifically identify PI3K, PDGFR, EGFR, and HDAC inhibitors as becoming significantly more efficacious during systemic BRAF inhibition. The sensitivity to other targeted inhibitors remained mostly unchanged, whereas local incremental sensitivity to PLX4720 declined sharply.
These findings suggest redundancy of several resistance mechanisms and may help identify optimal constituents of more effective combination therapy in BRAF-mutant melanoma. They also represent a new paradigm for dynamic measurement of adaptive signaling mechanisms within the same tumor during therapy. Clin Cancer Res; 22(24); 6031-8. ©2016 AACR.
使用基于BRAF抑制剂的疗法治疗BRAF突变的黑色素瘤肿瘤可产生较高的缓解率,但绝大多数患者的缓解持续时间有限。已发表的关于耐药机制的研究表明存在许多肿瘤适应性和信号转导旁路机制的例子,但未能深入了解可预测哪种机制将占主导地位的生物标志物。在同一肿瘤治疗期间适应过程中同时监测多种适应性机制的表型反应一直难以实现。
本研究报告了一种能更全面了解肿瘤适应性反应的方法。我们在全身BRAF抑制的不同时间点同时测量了12类疑似可导致适应性逃逸机制的抑制剂的体内抗肿瘤活性。我们使用可植入微型装置将多种化合物释放到肿瘤的不同区域,以独立测量每种化合物的疗效,并在肿瘤接受全身BRAF治疗进展过程中重复这些测量。
我们观察到在BRAF抑制剂长期全身治疗之前、期间和之后,对特定抑制剂有不同的表型反应。我们的结果明确指出PI3K、PDGFR、EGFR和HDAC抑制剂在全身BRAF抑制期间变得显著更有效。对其他靶向抑制剂的敏感性大多保持不变,而对PLX4720的局部增量敏感性急剧下降。
这些发现提示了几种耐药机制的冗余性,可能有助于确定BRAF突变黑色素瘤更有效联合治疗的最佳组成部分。它们还代表了治疗期间对同一肿瘤内适应性信号机制进行动态测量的新范例。《临床癌症研究》;22(24);6031 - 8。©2016美国癌症研究协会。