Hansson Nils, Halling Thorsten, Fangerau Heiner
a Department of History, Philosophy, and Ethics of Medicine, Medical Faculty , Heinrich-Heine-University Dusseldorf , Dusseldorf , Germany.
Acta Otolaryngol. 2016 Sep;136(9):871-4. doi: 10.3109/00016489.2016.1170203. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
This study is part of a larger project investigating the enactment of excellence in medicine, with a focus on the Nobel Prize. It takes a closer look at two promising candidates for the Prize in the 1920s and 1930s, Gustav Killian and Themistocles Gluck, and aims at reconstructing their Nobel careers as well as taking Gunnar Holmgren's role as a nominator and evaluator behind the curtains into account.
Besides the files collected at the Nobel Archive, the paper is based on a review of scientific publications and ergo-biographical sketches.
An analysis of Nobel Prize nominations and evaluations offer a unique perspective to study aspects of the history of otolaryngology.
Using original files in the archive of the Nobel committee for physiology or medicine in Sweden, this historical vignette explores judgments of scientific innovation and performance in the history of otolaryngology during the first half of the 20th century. This study shows that Gunnar Holmgren, the founder of Acta Oto-Laryngologica in 1918, repeatedly put forward scholars within the field as prime contenders for the award.
本研究是一个更大项目的一部分,该项目旨在调查医学领域卓越成就的展现情况,重点关注诺贝尔奖。它更深入地研究了20世纪20年代和30年代两位有望获得该奖项的候选人古斯塔夫·基利安和西奥多克勒斯·格鲁克,并旨在重建他们的诺贝尔奖之路,同时考虑到贡纳尔·霍尔姆格伦作为幕后提名者和评估者所起的作用。
除了在诺贝尔档案馆收集的文件外,本文还基于对科学出版物和职业传记草图的回顾。
对诺贝尔奖提名和评估的分析为研究耳鼻喉科学史的各个方面提供了独特的视角。
利用瑞典诺贝尔生理学或医学委员会档案中的原始文件,这篇历史短文探讨了20世纪上半叶耳鼻喉科学史中对科学创新和成就的评判。这项研究表明,1918年《耳鼻喉科学报》的创始人贡纳尔·霍尔姆格伦多次推荐该领域的学者作为该奖项的主要竞争者。