Suppr超能文献

家庭行为与2型糖尿病:针对社会经济地位低下的成年人进行干预时应关注的目标及应对方法。

Family behaviors and type 2 diabetes: What to target and how to address in interventions for adults with low socioeconomic status.

作者信息

Mayberry Lindsay Satterwhite, Harper Kryseana J, Osborn Chandra Y

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA Center for Health Behavior and Health Education, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA Center for Diabetes Translational Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA

Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA Center for Health Behavior and Health Education, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.

出版信息

Chronic Illn. 2016 Sep;12(3):199-215. doi: 10.1177/1742395316644303. Epub 2016 Apr 19.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Diabetes-specific family behaviors are associated with self-care and glycemic control among adults with type 2 diabetes. Formative research is needed to inform assessment of these behaviors and interventions to address obstructive family behaviors (sabotaging and nagging/arguing), particularly among racial/ethnic minorities and low-income adults who struggle most with self-care adherence.

METHODS

We conducted a mixed-methods study with adults with type 2 diabetes at a Federally Qualified Health Center to better understand experiences with diabetes-specific family behaviors and willingness to engage family members in diabetes interventions. Participants completed a phone survey (N = 53) and/or attended a focus group (n = 15).

RESULTS

Participants were 70% African American and had low socioeconomic status (96% annual income <US$20K, 51% uninsured). Although 62% lived with family members, only 48% lived with the person providing the most diabetes-specific support. Participants' family living situations were diverse and multigenerational. Most (64%) experienced both supportive and obstructive family behaviors from the same person(s). Some participants (40%) said engaging family in interventions would positively affect all members; others (27%) did not want to involve family.

DISCUSSION

Findings can inform the design and content of interventions targeting family involvement in adults' type 2 diabetes, with implications for assessing family behaviors, intervention modalities, and who to engage.

摘要

目的

特定于糖尿病的家庭行为与2型糖尿病成年人的自我护理及血糖控制相关。需要开展形成性研究,以指导对这些行为的评估以及针对阻碍性家庭行为(破坏和唠叨/争吵)的干预措施,尤其是在自我护理依从性方面最困难的少数族裔和低收入成年人中。

方法

我们在一家联邦合格健康中心对2型糖尿病成年人进行了一项混合方法研究,以更好地了解特定于糖尿病的家庭行为经历以及让家庭成员参与糖尿病干预的意愿。参与者完成了一项电话调查(N = 53)和/或参加了一个焦点小组(n = 15)。

结果

参与者中有70%是非裔美国人,社会经济地位较低(96%的年收入低于2万美元,51%没有保险)。尽管62%的人与家庭成员同住,但只有48%的人与提供最多糖尿病特定支持的人同住。参与者的家庭生活状况多样且跨代。大多数(64%)从同一个人那里既经历了支持性的家庭行为,也经历了阻碍性的家庭行为。一些参与者(40%)表示让家人参与干预会对所有成员产生积极影响;另一些人(27%)不想让家人参与。

讨论

研究结果可为针对家庭参与成年人2型糖尿病的干预措施的设计和内容提供参考,对评估家庭行为、干预方式以及参与对象具有启示意义。

相似文献

1
3
Family support, medication adherence, and glycemic control among adults with type 2 diabetes.
Diabetes Care. 2012 Jun;35(6):1239-45. doi: 10.2337/dc11-2103. Epub 2012 Apr 26.
4
Family involvement is helpful and harmful to patients' self-care and glycemic control.
Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Dec;97(3):418-25. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.09.011. Epub 2014 Sep 20.
6
Independent effects of socioeconomic and psychological social determinants of health on self-care and outcomes in Type 2 diabetes.
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2014 Nov-Dec;36(6):662-8. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2014.06.011. Epub 2014 Jul 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Feasibility of a family-oriented mHealth intervention for Chinese Americans with type 2 diabetes: A pilot randomized control trial.
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 11;19(3):e0299799. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299799. eCollection 2024.
2
Glycemic outcomes of a family-focused intervention for adults with type 2 diabetes: Main, mediated, and subgroup effects from the FAMS 2.0 RCT.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2023 Dec;206:110991. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2023.110991. Epub 2023 Nov 3.
3
Family support in the management of diabetes patients' perspectives from Limpopo province in South Africa.
BMC Public Health. 2022 Dec 23;22(1):2421. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14903-1.
4
Dyadic digital health interventions: Their rationale and implementation.
Procedia Comput Sci. 2022;206:183-194. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2022.09.097. Epub 2022 Sep 21.
8

本文引用的文献

1
Family interventions to improve diabetes outcomes for adults.
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2015 Sep;1353(1):89-112. doi: 10.1111/nyas.12844. Epub 2015 Aug 6.
3
An ecological perspective on diabetes self-care support, self-management behaviors, and hemoglobin A1C among Latinos.
Diabetes Educ. 2015 Apr;41(2):214-23. doi: 10.1177/0145721715569078. Epub 2015 Feb 5.
4
Stress, depression and medication nonadherence in diabetes: test of the exacerbating and buffering effects of family support.
J Behav Med. 2015 Apr;38(2):363-71. doi: 10.1007/s10865-014-9611-4. Epub 2014 Nov 25.
6
Family involvement is helpful and harmful to patients' self-care and glycemic control.
Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Dec;97(3):418-25. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.09.011. Epub 2014 Sep 20.
8
Stressors may compromise medication adherence among adults with diabetes and low socioeconomic status.
West J Nurs Res. 2014 Oct;36(9):1091-110. doi: 10.1177/0193945914524639. Epub 2014 Feb 25.
9
Diabetes self-management support using mHealth and enhanced informal caregiving.
J Diabetes Complications. 2014 Mar-Apr;28(2):171-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2013.11.008. Epub 2013 Nov 27.
10
Direct social support and long-term health among middle-aged and older adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2013 Nov;68(6):933-43. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbt100.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验