Beton Osman, Saricam Ersin, Kaya Hakki, Yucel Hasan, Dogdu Orhan, Turgut Okan Onur, Berkan Ocal, Tandogan Izzet, Yilmaz Mehmet Birhan
Department of Cardiology, Heart Center, University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Cumhuriyet University, Postal Code: 58140, Sivas, Turkey.
Cardiology Clinic, Cag Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2016 Apr 22;16:73. doi: 10.1186/s12872-016-0251-1.
The perioperative use of antithrombotic therapy is associated with increased bleeding risk after cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation. Topical application of tranexamic acid (TXA) is effective in reducing bleeding complications after various surgical operations. However, there is no information regarding local TXA application during CIED procedures. The purpose of our study was to evaluate bleeding complications rates during CIED implantation with and without topical TXA use in patients receiving antithrombotic treatment.
We conducted a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients undergoing CIED implantation while receiving warfarin or dual antiplatelet (DAPT) or warfarin plus DAPT treatment. Study population was classified in two groups according to presence or absence of topical TXA use during CIED implantation. Pocket hematoma (PH), major bleeding complications (MBC) and thromboembolic events occuring within 90 days were compared.
A total of 135 consecutive patients were identified and included in the analysis. The mean age was 60 ± 11 years old. Topical TXA application during implantation was reported in 52 patients (TXA group). The remaining 83 patients were assigned to the control group. PH occurred in 7.7 % patients in the TXA group and 26.5 % patients in the control group (P = 0.013). The MBC was reported in 5.8 % patients in the TXA and 20.5 % patients in control group (P = 0.024). Univariate logistic regression analysis identified age, history of recent stent implantation, periprocedural spironolactone use, periprocedural warfarin use, perioperative warfarin plus DAPT use, cardiac resynchronization therapy, and topical TXA application during CIED implantation as predicting factors of PH. Multivariate analysis showed that perioperative warfarin plus DAPT use (OR = 10.874, 95 % CI: 2.496-47.365, P = 0.001) and topical TXA application during CIED procedure (OR = 0.059, 95 % CI: 0.012-0.300, P = 0.001) were independent predictors of PH. Perioperative warfarin plus DAPT use and topical TXA application were also found to be independent predictors of MBC in multivariate analyses. No thromboembolic complications was recorded in the study group.
The present study demonstrated that the topical TXA application during CIED implantation is associated with reduced PH and MBC in patients with high bleeding risk.
心脏植入式电子设备(CIED)植入围手术期使用抗血栓治疗与出血风险增加相关。氨甲环酸(TXA)局部应用在减少各种外科手术后的出血并发症方面有效。然而,关于CIED手术期间局部应用TXA尚无相关信息。我们研究的目的是评估在接受抗血栓治疗的患者中,CIED植入时使用和不使用局部TXA情况下的出血并发症发生率。
我们对连续接受华法林或双联抗血小板(DAPT)或华法林加DAPT治疗的CIED植入患者进行了回顾性分析。根据CIED植入期间是否使用局部TXA,将研究人群分为两组。比较了90天内发生的囊袋血肿(PH)、严重出血并发症(MBC)和血栓栓塞事件。
共确定135例连续患者并纳入分析。平均年龄为60±11岁。52例患者(TXA组)报告在植入期间局部应用了TXA。其余83例患者被分配到对照组。TXA组7.7%的患者发生PH,对照组为26.5%(P = 0.013)。TXA组5.8%的患者报告发生MBC,对照组为20.5%(P = 0.024)。单因素逻辑回归分析确定年龄、近期支架植入史、围手术期使用螺内酯、围手术期使用华法林、围手术期华法林加DAPT使用、心脏再同步治疗以及CIED植入期间局部应用TXA为PH的预测因素。多因素分析显示,围手术期华法林加DAPT使用(OR = 10.874,95%CI:2.496 - 47.365,P = 0.001)和CIED手术期间局部应用TXA(OR =