Lindquist Liljeqvist Moritz, Hultgren Rebecka, Gasser T Christian, Roy Joy
Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Vascular Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
J Vasc Surg. 2016 Jun;63(6):1434-1442.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.11.051. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
The diagnosis and management of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) currently relies on the aortic maximal diameter, which grows in an unpredictable manner. Infrarenal aortic volume has recently become clinically feasible to measure, and an estimate of biomechanical rupture risk derived from finite element analysis, the peak wall rupture index (PWRI), has been shown to predict AAA rupture. Our objective was to ascertain how well volume growth correlates with baseline volume and increasing PWRI, compared with the maximal diameter.
We retrospectively identified 41 AAA patients (nine women, 32 men) at our institution who had undergone two computed tomography angiographies with an interval of 8 to 17 months. Digital three-dimensional reproductions of the aneurysms were segmented from the 82 computed tomography angiographies. AAA diameter, volume, and PWRI were measured and calculated with finite element analysis software. Growth rates of diameter and volume were related to baseline diameter and volume as well as to change rates of PWRI. Significant growth was defined as growth exceeding our interobserver 95% limits of agreement.
Diameter growth rate did not correlate with baseline diameter (r = 0.15, 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.17 to 0.45), but volume growth rate correlated with baseline volume (r = 0.56; 95% CI, 0.30-0.75). The correlation between baseline volume and volume growth rate was stronger than the correlation between baseline diameter and diameter growth rate (95% CI, 0.086-0.71). Increasing PWRI correlated with volume growth rate (r = 0.70; 95% CI, 0.40-0.87) but not with diameter growth rate (r = 0.044; 95% CI, -0.44 to 0.51), and the difference between the correlation coefficients was significant (95% CI, 0.11-1.16).
Volume better predicts aneurysm growth rate and correlates stronger with increasing estimated biomechanical rupture risk compared with diameter. Our results support the notion of monitoring all three dimensions of an AAA.
目前腹主动脉瘤(AAA)的诊断和管理依赖于主动脉最大直径,而其生长方式不可预测。肾下腹主动脉体积最近在临床上已可测量,并且通过有限元分析得出的生物力学破裂风险估计值——峰值壁破裂指数(PWRI),已被证明可预测AAA破裂。我们的目的是确定与最大直径相比,体积增长与基线体积及PWRI增加之间的相关性如何。
我们回顾性纳入了我院41例AAA患者(9例女性,32例男性),这些患者接受了间隔8至17个月的两次计算机断层血管造影。从82次计算机断层血管造影中对动脉瘤进行数字三维重建。使用有限元分析软件测量并计算AAA直径、体积和PWRI。直径和体积的增长率与基线直径和体积以及PWRI的变化率相关。显著增长定义为超过我们观察者间95%一致性界限的增长。
直径增长率与基线直径不相关(r = 0.15,95%置信区间[CI],-0.17至0.45),但体积增长率与基线体积相关(r = 0.56;95% CI,0.30 - 0.75)。基线体积与体积增长率之间的相关性强于基线直径与直径增长率之间的相关性(95% CI,0.086 - 0.71)。PWRI增加与体积增长率相关(r = 0.70;95% CI,0.40 - 0.87),但与直径增长率不相关(r = 0.044;95% CI,-0.44至0.51),且相关系数之间的差异具有显著性(95% CI,0.11 - 1.16)。
与直径相比,体积能更好地预测动脉瘤增长率,且与估计的生物力学破裂风险增加的相关性更强。我们的结果支持监测AAA所有三个维度的观点。