Moschetta Marco, Telegrafo Michele, Rella Leonarda, Stabile Ianora Amato Antonio, Angelelli Giuseppe
Section of Diagnostic Imaging, Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Aldo Moro University of Bari Medical School, Bari, Italy.
Section of Diagnostic Imaging, Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Aldo Moro University of Bari Medical School, Bari, Italy.
Clin Breast Cancer. 2016 Jun;16(3):207-11. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2016.02.008. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
The use of an abbreviated magnetic resonance (MR) protocol has been recently proposed for cancer screening. The aim of our study is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of an abbreviated MR protocol combining short TI inversion recovery (STIR), turbo-spin-echo (TSE)-T2 sequences, a pre-contrast T1, and a single intermediate (3 minutes after contrast injection) post-contrast T1 sequence for characterizing breast lesions.
A total of 470 patients underwent breast MR examination for screening, problem solving, or preoperative staging. Two experienced radiologists evaluated both standard and abbreviated protocols in consensus. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and diagnostic accuracy for both protocols were calculated (with the histological findings and 6-month ultrasound follow-up as the reference standard) and compared with the McNemar test. The post-processing and interpretation times for the MR images were compared with the paired t test.
In 177 of 470 (38%) patients, the MR sequences detected 185 breast lesions. Standard and abbreviated protocols obtained sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy, PPV, and NPV values respectively of 92%, 92%, 92%, 68%, and 98% and of 89%, 91%, 91%, 64%, and 98% with no statistically significant difference (P < .0001). The mean post-processing and interpretation time were, respectively, 7 ± 1 minutes and 6 ± 3.2 minutes for the standard protocol and 1 ± 1.2 minutes and 2 ± 1.2 minutes for the abbreviated protocol, with a statistically significant difference (P < .01).
An abbreviated combined MR protocol represents a time-saving tool for radiologists and patients with the same diagnostic potential as the standard protocol in patients undergoing breast MRI for screening, problem solving, or preoperative staging.
最近有人提出使用简化磁共振(MR)方案进行癌症筛查。我们研究的目的是评估一种简化MR方案的诊断准确性,该方案结合了短TI反转恢复(STIR)、快速自旋回波(TSE)-T2序列、对比剂前T1序列和单个对比剂注射后中间期(注射对比剂3分钟后)T1序列,用于乳腺病变的特征性诊断。
共有470例患者接受乳腺MR检查以进行筛查、问题解决或术前分期。两名经验丰富的放射科医生共同评估了标准方案和简化方案。计算了两种方案的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)和诊断准确性(以组织学结果和6个月的超声随访作为参考标准),并通过McNemar检验进行比较。MR图像的后处理和解读时间通过配对t检验进行比较。
在470例患者中的177例(38%)中,MR序列检测到185个乳腺病变。标准方案和简化方案的敏感性、特异性、诊断准确性、PPV和NPV值分别为92%、92%、92%、68%和98%以及89%、91%、91%、64%和98%,差异无统计学意义(P <.0001)。标准方案的平均后处理和解读时间分别为7±1分钟和6±3.2分钟,简化方案分别为1±1.2分钟和2±1.2分钟,差异有统计学意义(P <.01)。
对于接受乳腺MRI筛查、问题解决或术前分期的患者,简化的联合MR方案对放射科医生和患者来说是一种节省时间的工具,其诊断潜力与标准方案相同。