Nakano Eri, Hata Masayuki, Oishi Akio, Miyamoto Kazuaki, Uji Akihito, Fujimoto Masahiro, Miyata Manabu, Yoshimura Nagahisa
Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Kyoto University, 54 Shougoin Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2016 Aug;254(8):1609-1616. doi: 10.1007/s00417-016-3366-2. Epub 2016 Apr 26.
The purpose was to investigate an objective and quantitative method to estimate the redness of the optic disc neuroretinal rim, and to determine the usefulness of this method to differentiate compressive optic neuropathy (CON) from glaucomatous optic neuropathy (GON).
In our study there were 126 eyes: 40 with CON, 40 with normal tension glaucoma (NTG), and 46 normal eyes (NOR). Digital color fundus photographs were assessed for the redness of disc rim color using ImageJ software. We separately measured the intensity of red, green, and blue pixels from RGB images. Three disc color indices (DCIs), which indicate the redness intensity, were calculated through existing formulas.
All three DCIs of CON were significantly smaller than those of NOR (P < 0.001). In addition, when compared with NTG, DCIs were also significantly smaller in CON (P < 0.05). A comparison of mild CON and mild NTG (mean deviation (MD) > -6 dB), in which the extent of retinal nerve fiber layer thinning is comparable, the DCIs of mild CON were significantly smaller than those of mild NTG (P < 0.05). In contrast, DCIs did not differ between moderate-to-severe stages of CON and NTG (MD ≤ -6 dB), though the retinal nerve fibers of CON were more severely damaged than those of NTG. To differentiate between mild CON and mild NTG, all AUROCs for the three DCIs were above 0.700.
A quantitative and objective assessment of optic disc color was useful in differentiating early-stage CON from GON and NOR.
本研究旨在探索一种客观定量的方法来评估视盘神经视网膜边缘的发红情况,并确定该方法在鉴别压迫性视神经病变(CON)和青光眼性视神经病变(GON)方面的有效性。
本研究纳入126只眼,其中40只患有CON,40只患有正常眼压性青光眼(NTG),46只为正常眼(NOR)。使用ImageJ软件评估数字彩色眼底照片中视盘边缘颜色的发红情况。我们分别测量了RGB图像中红色、绿色和蓝色像素的强度。通过现有公式计算了三个表示发红强度的视盘颜色指数(DCI)。
CON组的所有三个DCI均显著低于NOR组(P < 0.001)。此外,与NTG组相比,CON组的DCI也显著更小(P < 0.05)。对轻度CON和轻度NTG(平均偏差(MD) > -6 dB)进行比较,这两组视网膜神经纤维层变薄程度相当,轻度CON组的DCI显著低于轻度NTG组(P < 0.05)。相比之下,CON组和NTG组中重度阶段(MD ≤ -6 dB)的DCI没有差异,尽管CON组的视网膜神经纤维损伤比NTG组更严重。为了区分轻度CON和轻度NTG,三个DCI的所有受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)均高于0.700。
对视盘颜色进行定量客观评估有助于鉴别早期CON与GON和NOR。