Suppr超能文献

血液透析患者心血管风险评分的开发与验证

Development and validation of cardiovascular risk scores for haemodialysis patients.

作者信息

Anker Stefan D, Gillespie Iain A, Eckardt Kai-Uwe, Kronenberg Florian, Richards Sharon, Drueke Tilman B, Stenvinkel Peter, Pisoni Ronald L, Robinson Bruce M, Marcelli Daniele, Froissart Marc, Floege Jürgen

机构信息

Innovative Clinical Trials, Department of Cardiology & Pneumology, University Medical Center Göttingen (UMG), Göttingen, Germany.

Center for Observational Research (CfOR), Amgen Ltd., Uxbridge, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Int J Cardiol. 2016 Aug 1;216:68-77. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.04.151. Epub 2016 Apr 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A simple clinical tool to predict cardiovascular disease risk does not exist for haemodialysis patients. The long-term coronary risk Framingham Heart Study Risk score (FRS), although used in this population, may be inadequate. Therefore, we developed separate risk-scores for cardiovascular mortality (CVM) and cardiovascular morbidity & mortality (CVMM) in a Fresenius Medical Care-based haemodialysis patient cohort (AROii).

METHODS

Applying a modified FRS approach, we derived and internally validated two-year risk-scores in incident European adult patients randomly assigned to a development (N=4831) or a validation (N=4796) dataset. External validation was conducted in the third Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS III) cohort. Additional discrimination comparing to the FRS was performed.

RESULTS

The overall two-year CVM and CVMM event rates were 5.0 and 22.6 per 100 person-years respectively. Common risk predictors included increasing age, cardiovascular disease history, primary diabetic nephropathy, low blood pressure, and inflammation. The CVM score was more predictive in AROii (c-statistic 0.72) and in DOPPS III (c-statistic 0.73-0.74) than the CVMM score (c-statistic 0.66-0.67 & 0.63 respectively). The FRS was not predictive of either CVM (c-statistic 0.54) or CVMM (c-statistic 0.56) in AROii.

CONCLUSIONS

We describe novel, easy-to-apply and interpret CV risk-scores for haemodialysis patients. Our improved cardiovascular prediction performance over traditional (FRS) scores reflected its tailored development and validation in haemodialysis populations, and the integration of non-classical cardiovascular risk factors. The lower expected versus observed CVM and CVMM risk suggests the existence of novel cardiovascular risk factors in this patient population not measured in this study.

摘要

背景

目前尚无用于预测血液透析患者心血管疾病风险的简单临床工具工具预测工具。长期的冠状动脉风险弗雷明汉心脏研究风险评分(FRS)虽用于该人群,但可能并不充分。因此,我们在费森尤斯医疗护理中心的血液透析患者队列(AROii)中,针对心血管死亡率(CVM)和心血管发病率及死亡率(CVMM)制定了单独的风险评分。

方法

采用改良的FRS方法,我们在随机分配至开发数据集(N = 4831)或验证数据集(N = 4796)的欧洲成年初诊患者中得出并进行了两年风险评分的内部验证。在第三次透析结果和实践模式研究(DOPPS III)队列中进行了外部验证。与FRS进行了额外的区分度比较。

结果

总体两年CVM和CVMM事件发生率分别为每100人年5.0和22.6。常见的风险预测因素包括年龄增加、心血管疾病史、原发性糖尿病肾病、低血压和炎症。CVM评分在AROii(c统计量0.72)和DOPPS III(c统计量0.73 - 0.74)中比CVMM评分(c统计量分别为0.66 - 0.67和0.63)更具预测性。在AROii中,FRS对CVM(c统计量0.54)或CVMM(c统计量0.56)均无预测性。

结论

我们描述了适用于血液透析患者的新型、易于应用和解释的心血管风险评分。与传统(FRS)评分相比,我们改进的心血管预测性能反映了其在血液透析人群中的针对性开发和验证,以及非经典心血管危险因素的纳入。预期的CVM和CVMM风险低于观察到的风险,这表明该患者人群中存在本研究未测量的新型心血管危险因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验