Asaadi Sina, Ashrafi Farzad, Omidbeigi Mahmoud, Nasiri Zahra, Pakdaman Hossein, Amini-Harandi Ali
Functional Neurosurgery Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Iran J Neurol. 2016 Jan 5;15(1):16-22.
Cognitive impairment in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) mainly involves executive function (EF). The frontal assessment battery (FAB) is an efficient tool for the assessment of EFs. The aims of this study were to determine the validity and reliability of the psychometric properties of the Persian version of FAB and assess its correlation with formal measures of EFs to provide normative data for the Persian version of FAB in patients with PD.
The study recruited 149 healthy participants and 49 patients with idiopathic PD. In PD patients, FAB results were compared to their performance on EF tests. Reliability analysis involved test-retest reliability and internal consistency, whereas validity analysis involved convergent validity approach. FAB scores compared in normal controls and in PD patients matched for age, education, and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score.
In PD patients, FAB scores were significantly decreased compared to normal controls, and correlated with Stroop test and Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST). In healthy subjects, FAB scores varied according to the age, education, and MMSE. In the FAB subtest analysis, the performances of PD patients were worse than the healthy participants on similarities, fluency tasks, and Luria's motor series.
Persian version of FAB could be used as a reliable scale for the assessment of frontal lobe functions in Iranian patients with PD. Furthermore, normative data provided for the Persian version of this test improve the accuracy and confidence in the clinical application of the FAB.
帕金森病(PD)患者的认知障碍主要涉及执行功能(EF)。额叶评估量表(FAB)是评估执行功能的有效工具。本研究旨在确定波斯语版FAB心理测量特性的有效性和可靠性,并评估其与执行功能正式测量方法的相关性,为伊朗PD患者提供波斯语版FAB的规范数据。
本研究招募了149名健康参与者和49名特发性PD患者。在PD患者中,将FAB结果与其在执行功能测试中的表现进行比较。可靠性分析包括重测信度和内部一致性,而效度分析采用收敛效度方法。比较了正常对照组以及年龄、教育程度和简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)得分相匹配PD患者的FAB分数。
与正常对照组相比,PD患者的FAB分数显著降低,且与Stroop测试和威斯康星卡片分类测试(WCST)相关。在健康受试者中,FAB分数因年龄、教育程度和MMSE而异。在FAB子测试分析中,PD患者在相似性、流畅性任务和鲁利亚运动序列方面的表现比健康参与者差。
波斯语版FAB可作为评估伊朗PD患者额叶功能的可靠量表。此外,为本测试的波斯语版提供的规范数据提高了FAB临床应用的准确性和可信度。