Suppr超能文献

乌干达部分地区猪布鲁氏菌病的血清学和分子学调查

Serological and molecular investigation for brucellosis in swine in selected districts of Uganda.

作者信息

Erume Joseph, Roesel Kristina, Dione Michel M, Ejobi Francis, Mboowa Gerald, Kungu Joseph M, Akol Joyce, Pezo Danilo, El-Adawy Hosny, Melzer Falk, Elschner Mandy, Neubauer Heinrich, Grace Delia

机构信息

College of Veterinary Medicine, Animal Resources and Biosecurity, Makerere University, P. O. Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda.

International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), C/O Bioversity International, P. O. Box 24384, Kampala, Uganda.

出版信息

Trop Anim Health Prod. 2016 Aug;48(6):1147-55. doi: 10.1007/s11250-016-1067-9. Epub 2016 May 3.

Abstract

Brucellosis is a notifiable zoonotic disease affecting livestock, humans, and wildlife in Uganda. Pigs can be infected with human pathogenic Brucella suis biovars 1 and 3 and can be a significant source of brucellosis for humans. Uganda has a rapidly growing pig population, and the pork consumption per capita is the highest in East Africa. The objective of this work was to determine the seroprevalence of brucellosis in Ugandan pigs. A cross-sectional serosurvey of pigs was conducted in three of the major pig-keeping districts in Uganda (Masaka (n = 381 samples), Mukono (n = 398), and Kamuli (n = 414)). In addition, pigs originating from these districts were sampled in the major pig abattoir in Kampala (n = 472). In total, 1665 serum samples were investigated by serological and molecular tests. Only three putative brucellosis-positive samples were detected serologically using indirect ELISA. These sera were found negative for Brucella antibodies by CFT; however, two had antibodies against Yersinia enterocolitica as determined by SAT. Presence of antibodies against Yersiniae was confirmed by Y. enterocolitica antibody-specific ELISA. The two Yersiniae ELISA-positive samples were brucellosis negative using real-time PCR. We tested additional 142 sera from the 1665 samples with real-time PCR. All tested negative. Under this type of production system, we expect a maximum B. suis prevalence of less than 1 % at 95 % confidence level, and therefore, the risk of acquiring brucellosis from the pigs or their products is negligible. However, pigs may harbor the zoonotic Y. enterocolitica. This is the first study to investigate the occurrence of brucellosis in pigs in Uganda and the first study to report Y. enterocolitica antibodies in swine in Uganda.

摘要

布鲁氏菌病是乌干达一种须上报的人畜共患病,会影响家畜、人类和野生动物。猪可感染人致病性猪布鲁氏菌生物变种1型和3型,并且可能成为人类布鲁氏菌病的重要传染源。乌干达的猪数量增长迅速,人均猪肉消费量在东非地区最高。这项工作的目的是确定乌干达猪群中布鲁氏菌病的血清阳性率。在乌干达三个主要的养猪区(马萨卡(n = 381份样本)、穆科诺(n = 398份)和卡穆利(n = 414份))对猪进行了横断面血清学调查。此外,还在坎帕拉的主要生猪屠宰场对来自这些地区的猪进行了采样(n = 472份)。总共对1665份血清样本进行了血清学和分子检测。使用间接ELISA血清学检测仅发现3份疑似布鲁氏菌病阳性样本。这些血清通过补体结合试验(CFT)检测布鲁氏菌抗体呈阴性;然而,通过试管凝集试验(SAT)检测发现其中两份含有抗小肠结肠炎耶尔森菌的抗体。通过小肠结肠炎耶尔森菌抗体特异性ELISA确认了抗耶尔森菌抗体的存在。这两份耶尔森菌ELISA阳性样本通过实时PCR检测布鲁氏菌病呈阴性。我们用实时PCR对1665份样本中的另外142份血清进行了检测。所有检测结果均为阴性。在这种生产系统下,我们预计在95%置信水平下猪布鲁氏菌的最高流行率低于1%,因此,从猪及其产品感染布鲁氏菌病的风险可以忽略不计。然而,猪可能携带人畜共患的小肠结肠炎耶尔森菌。这是乌干达第一项调查猪群中布鲁氏菌病发生情况的研究,也是乌干达第一项报告猪群中存在小肠结肠炎耶尔森菌抗体的研究。

相似文献

1
Serological and molecular investigation for brucellosis in swine in selected districts of Uganda.
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2016 Aug;48(6):1147-55. doi: 10.1007/s11250-016-1067-9. Epub 2016 May 3.
2
Detection of brucellosis and leptospirosis in feral pigs in New South Wales.
Aust Vet J. 2014 Sep;92(9):343-7. doi: 10.1111/avj.12203. Epub 2014 Jun 23.
3
Seroprevalence of Brucella suis in eastern Latvian wild boars (Sus scrofa).
Acta Vet Scand. 2018 Mar 24;60(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s13028-018-0373-9.
4
Cell-mediated immune responses differentiate infections with Brucella suis from Yersinia enterocolitica serotype O:9 in pigs.
Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2007 Mar 15;116(1-2):13-25. doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2006.12.006. Epub 2007 Jan 9.
5
Estimation of sensitivity and specificity of five serological tests for the diagnosis of porcine brucellosis.
Prev Vet Med. 2012 Apr 1;104(1-2):94-100. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2011.10.014. Epub 2011 Dec 5.
6
Seroprevalence of brucellosis, tularemia, and yersiniosis in wild boars (Sus scrofa) from north-eastern Germany.
J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public Health. 2005 Dec;52(10):444-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0450.2005.00898.x.
7
Serological and molecular analysis for brucellosis in selected swine herds from Southern India.
J Infect Public Health. 2019 Mar-Apr;12(2):247-251. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2018.10.013. Epub 2018 Nov 15.
8
Brucella suis infection in domestic pigs in Sardinia (Italy).
Epidemiol Infect. 2015 Jul;143(10):2170-7. doi: 10.1017/S0950268814003513. Epub 2014 Dec 22.
9
Countrywide cross-sectional study of swine brucellosis sero-prevalence in Indian subcontinent during 2018-2019.
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2022 Feb 25;54(2):114. doi: 10.1007/s11250-022-03107-9.
10
First Report of the Occurrence of Trichinella-Specific Antibodies in Domestic Pigs in Central and Eastern Uganda.
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 21;11(11):e0166258. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166258. eCollection 2016.

引用本文的文献

2
Sero-prevalence and risk factors associated with occurrence of anti-Brucella antibodies among slaughterhouse workers in Uganda.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2024 Mar 18;18(3):e0012046. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012046. eCollection 2024 Mar.
3
Sero-prevalence and factors associated with anti- antibodies in slaughter livestock in Uganda.
Front Epidemiol. 2023 Jun 29;3:1213592. doi: 10.3389/fepid.2023.1213592. eCollection 2023.
5
Seromonitoring of brucellosis in goats and sheep slaughtered at an abattoir in Kampala, Uganda.
J Vet Diagn Invest. 2022 Nov;34(6):964-967. doi: 10.1177/10406387221126658. Epub 2022 Sep 20.
7
Brucellosis in wildlife in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 16;11(1):5960. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-85441-w.
8
Brucellosis: Prevalence with reference to East African community countries - A rapid review.
Vet Med Sci. 2021 May;7(3):851-867. doi: 10.1002/vms3.425. Epub 2021 Jan 9.
10
A retrospective study (2007-2015) on brucellosis seropositivity in livestock in South Africa.
Vet Med Sci. 2021 Mar;7(2):348-356. doi: 10.1002/vms3.363. Epub 2020 Oct 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Brucellosis in Sub-Saharan Africa: Current challenges for management, diagnosis and control.
Acta Trop. 2017 Jan;165:179-193. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2015.10.023. Epub 2015 Nov 10.
2
3
4
Economics of brucellosis impact and control in low-income countries.
Rev Sci Tech. 2013 Apr;32(1):249-61. doi: 10.20506/rst.32.1.2197.
5
A survey of zoonotic diseases in trade cattle slaughtered at Tanga city abattoir: a cause of public health concern.
Asian Pac J Trop Biomed. 2012 Jan;2(1):55-60. doi: 10.1016/S2221-1691(11)60190-1.
6
A "One Health" surveillance and control of brucellosis in developing countries: moving away from improvisation.
Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 2013 May;36(3):241-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cimid.2012.09.001. Epub 2012 Oct 6.
7
Behavior of Yersinia enterocolitica in Foods.
J Pathog. 2011;2011:420732. doi: 10.4061/2011/420732. Epub 2011 Oct 23.
8
Assessment of performance of selected serological tests for diagnosing brucellosis in pigs.
Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2012 Apr 15;146(2):150-8. doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2012.02.012. Epub 2012 Mar 1.
9
Characterization of Yersinia enterocolitica 4/O:3 isolates from tonsils of Bavarian slaughter pigs.
Lett Appl Microbiol. 2010 Apr;50(4):412-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2010.02816.x. Epub 2010 Feb 1.
10
Human brucellosis in urban and peri-urban areas of Kampala, Uganda.
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008 Dec;1149:309-11. doi: 10.1196/annals.1428.015.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验