Lee Jane J, Britton Kathryn A, Pedley Alison, Massaro Joseph M, Speliotes Elizabeth K, Murabito Joanne M, Hoffmann Udo, Ingram Cheryl, Keaney John F, Vasan Ramachandran S, Fox Caroline S
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's and Boston University's Framingham Heart Study, Framingham, MA.
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's and Boston University's Framingham Heart Study, Framingham, MA Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 May 4;5(5):e002936. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.002936.
Visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and fatty liver differ in their associations with cardiovascular risk compared with subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT). Several biomarkers have been linked to metabolic derangements and may contribute to the pathogenicity of fat depots. We examined the association between fat depots on multidetector computed tomography and metabolic regulatory biomarkers.
Participants from the Framingham Heart Study (n=1583, 47% women) underwent assessment of SAT, VAT, and liver attenuation. We measured circulating biomarkers secreted by adipose tissue or liver (adiponectin, leptin, leptin receptor, fatty acid binding protein 4, fetuin-A, and retinol binding protein 4). Using multivariable linear regression models, we examined relations of fat depots with biomarkers. Higher levels of fat depots were positively associated with leptin and fatty acid binding protein 4 but negatively associated with adiponectin (all P<0.001). Associations with leptin receptor, fetuin-A, and retinol binding protein 4 varied according to fat depot type or sex. When comparing the associations of SAT and VAT with biomarkers, VAT was the stronger correlate of adiponectin (β=-0.28 [women]; β=-0.30 [men]; both P<0.001), whereas SAT was the stronger correlate of leptin (β=0.62 [women]; β=0.49 [men]; both P<0.001; P<0.001 for comparing VAT versus SAT). Although fetuin-A and retinol binding protein 4 are secreted by the liver in addition to adipose tissue, associations of liver attenuation with these biomarkers was not stronger than that of SAT or VAT.
SAT, VAT, and liver attenuation are associated with metabolic regulatory biomarkers with differences in the associations by fat depot type and sex. These findings support the possibility of biological differences between fat depots.
与皮下脂肪组织(SAT)相比,内脏脂肪组织(VAT)和脂肪肝与心血管风险的关联有所不同。几种生物标志物与代谢紊乱有关,可能导致脂肪堆积的致病性。我们研究了多排螺旋计算机断层扫描上的脂肪堆积与代谢调节生物标志物之间的关联。
来自弗雷明汉心脏研究的参与者(n = 1583,47%为女性)接受了SAT、VAT和肝脏衰减的评估。我们测量了由脂肪组织或肝脏分泌的循环生物标志物(脂联素、瘦素、瘦素受体、脂肪酸结合蛋白4、胎球蛋白-A和视黄醇结合蛋白4)。使用多变量线性回归模型,我们研究了脂肪堆积与生物标志物之间的关系。较高水平的脂肪堆积与瘦素和脂肪酸结合蛋白4呈正相关,但与脂联素呈负相关(所有P<0.001)。与瘦素受体、胎球蛋白-A和视黄醇结合蛋白4的关联因脂肪堆积类型或性别而异。在比较SAT和VAT与生物标志物的关联时,VAT与脂联素的相关性更强(β=-0.28[女性];β=-0.30[男性];两者P<0.001),而SAT与瘦素的相关性更强(β=0.62[女性];β=0.49[男性];两者P<0.001;比较VAT与SAT时P<0.001)。尽管胎球蛋白-A和视黄醇结合蛋白4除了由脂肪组织分泌外还由肝脏分泌,但肝脏衰减与这些生物标志物的关联并不比SAT或VAT更强。
SAT、VAT和肝脏衰减与代谢调节生物标志物有关,脂肪堆积类型和性别之间的关联存在差异。这些发现支持了脂肪堆积之间存在生物学差异的可能性。