Department of Oral Implantology and Prosthetic Dentistry, Academic Center for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), Move Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Clinic of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Material Science, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 Jul;28(7):e60-e67. doi: 10.1111/clr.12863. Epub 2016 May 6.
To assess implant survival rates and peri-implant bone loss of 2 titanium-zirconium implants supporting maxillary overdentures at 1 year of loading.
Twenty maxillary edentulous patients (5 women and 15 men) being dissatisfied with their complete dentures were included. In total, 40 diameter-reduced titanium-zirconium implants were placed in the anterior maxilla. Local guided bone regeneration (GBR) was allowed if the treatment did not compromise implant stability. Following 3 to 5 months of healing, implant-supported overdentures were inserted on two ball anchors. Implants and overdentures were assessed at 1, 2, 4, and 8 weeks after implant insertion and 2, 4, and 12 months after insertion of overdentures (baseline). Standardized radiographs were taken at implant loading and 1 year. Implant survival rates and bone loss were the primary outcomes.
Nineteen patients (1 dropout) with 38 implants were evaluated at a mean follow-up of 1.1 years (range 1.0-1.7 years). One implant failed resulting in an implant survival rate of 97.3%. There was a significant peri-implant bone loss of the implants at 1 year of function (mean, 0.7 mm, SD = 1.1 mm; median: 0.48 mm, IQR = 0.56 mm).
There was a high 1-year implant survival rate for edentulous patients receiving 2 maxillary implants and ball anchors as overdenture support. However, several implants exhibited an increased amount of bone loss of more than 2 mm. Overdentures supported by 2 maxillary implants should thus be used with caution as minimally invasive treatment for specific patients encountering problems with their upper dentures until more long-term data is available.
评估 2 颗钛锆种植体支持上颌覆盖义齿在负荷 1 年后的种植体存活率和种植体周围骨丧失情况。
共纳入 20 名上颌无牙患者(5 名女性和 15 名男性),他们对全口义齿不满意。在前上颌共放置 40 颗直径减小的钛锆种植体。如果治疗不影响种植体稳定性,则允许进行局部引导骨再生(GBR)。在愈合期 3 至 5 个月后,在两个球型附着体上插入种植体支持的覆盖义齿。在种植体插入后 1、2、4 和 8 周以及插入覆盖义齿后 2、4 和 12 个月(基线)后对种植体和覆盖义齿进行评估。在种植体负荷和 1 年后拍摄标准化 X 光片。种植体存活率和骨丧失是主要结果。
19 名患者(1 名脱落)的 38 颗种植体在平均 1.1 年的随访中进行了评估(范围为 1.0-1.7 年)。1 颗种植体失败,种植体存活率为 97.3%。在功能 1 年后,种植体周围有明显的骨质丧失(平均 0.7 毫米,标准差 1.1 毫米;中位数:0.48 毫米,四分位距 0.56 毫米)。
对于接受 2 颗上颌种植体和球型附着体作为覆盖义齿支撑的无牙患者,1 年种植体存活率较高。然而,一些种植体的骨质丧失超过 2 毫米。在有更多长期数据可用之前,应谨慎使用 2 颗上颌种植体支持的覆盖义齿,为对上颌义齿有问题的特定患者提供微创治疗。