Honigman Liat, Bar-Bachar Ofrit, Yarnitsky David, Sprecher Elliot, Granovsky Yelena
The Laboratory of Clinical Neurophysiology, Technion Faculty of Medicine, Haifa, Israel.
Institute of Pain Medicine, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel.
Pain. 2016 Sep;157(9):2000-2011. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000604.
Compression therapy, a well-recognized treatment for lymphoedema and venous disorders, pressurizes limbs and generates massive non-noxious afferent sensory barrages. The aim of this study was to study whether such afferent activity has an analgesic effect when applied on the lower limbs, hypothesizing that larger compression areas will induce stronger analgesic effects, and whether this effect correlates with conditioned pain modulation (CPM). Thirty young healthy subjects received painful heat and pressure stimuli (47°C for 30 seconds, forearm; 300 kPa for 15 seconds, wrist) before and during 3 compression protocols of either SMALL (up to ankles), MEDIUM (up to knees), or LARGE (up to hips) compression areas. Conditioned pain modulation (heat pain conditioned by noxious cold water) was tested before and after each compression protocol. The LARGE protocol induced more analgesia for heat than the SMALL protocol (P < 0.001). The analgesic effect interacted with gender (P = 0.015). The LARGE protocol was more efficient for females, whereas the MEDIUM protocol was more efficient for males. Pressure pain was reduced by all protocols (P < 0.001) with no differences between protocols and no gender effect. Conditioned pain modulation was more efficient than the compression-induced analgesia. For the LARGE protocol, precompression CPM efficiency positively correlated with compression-induced analgesia. Large body area compression exerts an area-dependent analgesic effect on experimental pain stimuli. The observed correlation with pain inhibition in response to robust non-noxious sensory stimulation may suggest that compression therapy shares similar mechanisms with inhibitory pain modulation assessed through CPM.
压迫疗法是一种公认的治疗淋巴水肿和静脉疾病的方法,它通过对肢体施加压力来产生大量无害的传入感觉信号。本研究的目的是探讨这种传入活动作用于下肢时是否具有镇痛效果,假设更大的压迫面积会产生更强的镇痛效果,以及这种效果是否与条件性疼痛调制(CPM)相关。30名年轻健康受试者在三种压迫方案(小面积:至脚踝;中面积:至膝盖;大面积:至臀部)实施前及实施过程中,分别接受疼痛的热刺激和压力刺激(前臂47°C持续30秒;手腕300 kPa持续15秒)。在每个压迫方案前后测试条件性疼痛调制(用有害冷水诱发热痛)。与小面积方案相比,大面积方案对热刺激诱导出更多的镇痛效果(P < 0.001)。镇痛效果与性别存在交互作用(P = 0.015)。大面积方案对女性更有效,而中面积方案对男性更有效。所有方案均能减轻压力性疼痛(P < 0.001),各方案之间无差异,也无性别效应。条件性疼痛调制比压迫诱导的镇痛更有效。对于大面积方案,预压迫时的CPM效率与压迫诱导的镇痛呈正相关。大面积身体区域压迫对实验性疼痛刺激具有面积依赖性镇痛作用。观察到的与对强烈无害感觉刺激的疼痛抑制的相关性可能表明,压迫疗法与通过CPM评估的抑制性疼痛调制具有相似的机制。