Iaccarino Corrado, Mattogno Pier P, Zanotti Bruno, Bellocchi Silvio, Verlicchi Angela, Viaroli Edoardo, Pastorello Giulia, Sgulò Francesco, Ghadirpour Reza, Servadei Franco
Unit of Neurosurgery and Neurotraumatology, Parma University Hospital, Parma, Italy.
Department of Emergency Neurosurgery, Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova, Institute for Research and Care, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
J Neurosurg Sci. 2018 Dec;62(6):765-772. doi: 10.23736/S0390-5616.16.03721-8. Epub 2016 May 13.
After failing of autologous cranioplasty or when the bone flap is unavailable, the alloplastic (heterologous) materials are the choice for cranial reconstruction. No agreement has been reported about the material with a significant lower risk of septic complications. This is due to extremely heterogeneous prognostic factors related not only to the material used but also to the surgical procedures and/or to the timing of the procedure. More attention should be focused on the material whose characteristic could enable a delay in bacterial colonization, where an antibiotic therapy could be effective, without need of prosthesis removal. Four cases of severe septic complication following cranioplasty with porous hydroxyapatite (HA) prosthesis are presented. Patients were conservatively treated, without heterologous bone flap removal. All of our patients presented reasons for delaying HA cranioplasty removal: patients #1, 3, and 4 had an associated shunted hydrocephalus and the need for not removing the prosthesis was related to the predictable recurrence of overshunting and/or sinking skin flap syndrome. In patient #4, the revision surgery would have also damaged the microvascular flap with latissimus dorsi muscle used by plastic surgeon for skin reconstruction. In patient #2, the patient refused revision surgery. In all cases, systemic and/or radiological signs of infection were observed. In patient #2 the infective process surrounded completely the HA prosthesis, while it was located in the epidural region in patients #1 and 4. In patient #3, a surgical curettage of the infected wound was performed over the HA prosthesis. Following prosthesis retention management with antibiotic therapy, all patients revealed systemic and/or radiological signs of sepsis resolution at follow-up. The possibility to avoid a prosthesis removal with effective antibiotic treatment is mainly due to the combination of three factors: targeted antibiotic therapy, good anatomical area revascularization (resulting of an "in situ" intake of antibiotics), and the biomimetism of HA prosthesis. Further investigations in a larger number of cases need to confirm these observations.
自体颅骨成形失败或骨瓣无法使用时,异体材料是颅骨重建的选择。目前尚无关于哪种材料能显著降低感染并发症风险的一致报道。这是由于预后因素极其多样,不仅与所用材料有关,还与手术操作和/或手术时机有关。应更多关注其特性能够延缓细菌定植的材料,在这种情况下抗生素治疗可能有效,而无需移除假体。本文介绍了4例使用多孔羟基磷灰石(HA)假体进行颅骨成形术后发生严重感染并发症的病例。患者接受了保守治疗,未移除异体骨瓣。我们所有的患者都有延迟移除HA假体的原因:病例1、3和4伴有分流性脑积水,不移除假体的原因是预计会出现过度分流复发和/或皮肤瓣下陷综合征。在病例4中,翻修手术还会损伤整形外科医生用于皮肤重建的带背阔肌的微血管皮瓣。病例2的患者拒绝翻修手术。所有病例均观察到全身和/或影像学感染迹象。病例2的感染过程完全包围了HA假体,而病例1和4的感染位于硬膜外区域。病例3对HA假体上方的感染伤口进行了手术刮除。在采用抗生素治疗保留假体后,所有患者在随访时均显示全身和/或影像学败血症消退迹象。通过有效的抗生素治疗避免移除假体的可能性主要归因于三个因素的结合:靶向抗生素治疗、良好的解剖区域血管再生(导致抗生素“原位”摄取)以及HA假体的生物模拟性。需要更多病例的进一步研究来证实这些观察结果。