Biesheuvel-Leliefeld Karolien E M, Kok Gemma D, Bockting Claudi L H, de Graaf Ron, Ten Have Margreet, van der Horst Henriette E, van Schaik Anneke, van Marwijk Harm W J, Smit Filip
Department of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, and EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University medical centre, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Clinical and Experimental Psychology, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 May 12;16:139. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-0843-4.
Major depression is the leading cause of non-fatal disease burden. Because major depression is not a homogeneous condition, this study estimated the non-fatal disease burden for mild, moderate and severe depression in both single episode and recurrent depression. All estimates were assessed from an individual and a population perspective and presented as unadjusted, raw estimates and as estimates adjusted for comorbidity.
We used data from the first wave of the second Netherlands-Mental-Health-Survey-and-Incidence-Study (NEMESIS-2, n = 6646; single episode Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM)-IV depression, n = 115; recurrent depression, n = 246). Disease burden from an individual perspective was assessed as 'disability weight * time spent in depression' for each person in the dataset. From a population perspective it was assessed as 'disability weight * time spent in depression *number of people affected'. The presence of mental disorders was assessed with the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) 3.0.
Single depressive episodes emerged as a key driver of disease burden from an individual perspective. From a population perspective, recurrent depressions emerged as a key driver. These findings remained unaltered after adjusting for comorbidity.
The burden of disease differs between the subtype of depression and depends much on the choice of perspective. The distinction between an individual and a population perspective may help to avoid misunderstandings between policy makers and clinicians.
重度抑郁症是导致非致命性疾病负担的主要原因。由于重度抑郁症并非单一病症,本研究估算了单次发作和复发性抑郁症中轻度、中度和重度抑郁症的非致命性疾病负担。所有估算均从个体和人群角度进行评估,并以未调整的原始估算值以及针对合并症进行调整后的估算值呈现。
我们使用了荷兰第二次精神健康调查与发病率研究(NEMESIS - 2,n = 6646;单次发作的《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(DSM)-IV抑郁症,n = 115;复发性抑郁症,n = 246)第一波的数据。从个体角度评估疾病负担为数据集中每个人的“残疾权重 * 处于抑郁状态的时间”。从人群角度评估为“残疾权重 * 处于抑郁状态的时间 * 受影响人数”。使用复合国际诊断访谈(CIDI)3.0评估精神障碍的存在情况。
从个体角度来看,单次抑郁发作是疾病负担的关键驱动因素。从人群角度来看,复发性抑郁症是关键驱动因素。在对合并症进行调整后,这些发现仍然不变。
抑郁症亚型之间的疾病负担有所不同,并且很大程度上取决于所选择的角度。个体角度和人群角度的区分可能有助于避免政策制定者和临床医生之间的误解。