Tuuli Methodius G, Stout Molly J, Martin Shannon, Rampersad Roxane M, Cahill Alison G, Macones George A
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Oct;215(4):490.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.05.012. Epub 2016 May 12.
Subcuticular skin closure with suture after cesarean has been shown to result in lower rates of wound complications than with staple closure. However, the optimal choice of suture material for subcuticular skin closure is unclear. Vicryl (a braided multifilament synthetic suture; Ethicon, Somerville, NJ) and Monocryl (a monofilament synthetic suture; Ethicon) are the commonly used suture materials for subcuticular closure of transverse skin incisions after cesarean in the United States. Whereas in vitro and animal studies suggest multifilament suture materials may be associated with a higher risk of wound infection than monofilament sutures, clinical data on their relative effectiveness are limited.
We sought to test the hypothesis that Vicryl is associated with a higher rate of wound complications than Monocryl.
This is a secondary analysis of data from a randomized trial in which pregnant women undergoing scheduled or unscheduled cesareans were randomly assigned to preoperative skin preparation with either chlorhexidine-alcohol or iodine-alcohol. Women with low transverse skin incisions who were closed with either 4-0 Monocryl or 4-0 Vicryl were included in this analysis. Choice of suture material was at the discretion of the operating physician. The primary outcome was superficial or deep surgical site infection within 30 days after cesarean. Secondary outcomes were other wound complications. Outcomes were compared between the 2 groups using univariable and multivariable statistics.
Of 1082 patients who had follow-up after discharge in the primary trial, 871 had subcuticular suture: 180 with 4-0 Vicryl and 691 with 4-0 Monocryl. Skin closure with Vicryl or Monocryl did not significantly differ between women allocated to chlorhexidine-alcohol or iodine-alcohol (51.1% vs 49.4%, P = .67). There was no significant difference in the risk of surgical site infection in women closed with Vicryl compared with Monocryl (11 [6.1%] vs 35 [5.1%]; P = .58; adjusted odds ratio, 1.23; 95% confidence interval, 0.60-2.49). Rates of other wound complications were also not significantly different. Risks of surgical site infection were similar with Vicryl and Monocryl closure in all subgroups assessed. The relative risks were not materially affected by whether diabetes or obesity was present, cesarean was scheduled or unscheduled, primary or repeat cesarean, or the subcutaneous layer was closed. Post hoc power analysis indicated that we had 80% power to detect >2-fold difference in surgical site infections.
Subcuticular skin closure with 4-0 Vicryl is associated with comparable rates of surgical site infection and other wound complications as 4-0 Monocryl. While this is an observational study with the potential for selection bias and residual confounding, our results suggest physician preference is acceptable for choice of subcuticular suture material at cesarean.
剖宫产术后采用缝线皮下缝合,其伤口并发症发生率低于钉合闭合。然而,皮下缝合的最佳缝线材料选择尚不清楚。薇乔缝线(一种编织多股合成缝线;美国新泽西州萨默维尔市的爱惜康公司生产)和慕丝线(一种单股合成缝线;爱惜康公司生产)是美国剖宫产术后横向皮肤切口皮下缝合常用的缝线材料。尽管体外和动物研究表明,多股缝线材料可能比单股缝线有更高的伤口感染风险,但其相对有效性的临床数据有限。
我们试图检验如下假设:薇乔缝线比慕丝线导致更高的伤口并发症发生率。
这是一项对随机试验数据的二次分析,该试验中接受择期或非择期剖宫产的孕妇被随机分配接受氯己定 - 酒精或碘 - 酒精术前皮肤准备。采用4 - 0慕丝线或4 - 0薇乔缝线闭合低位横向皮肤切口的女性纳入本分析。缝线材料的选择由手术医生自行决定。主要结局是剖宫产后30天内的表浅或深部手术部位感染。次要结局是其他伤口并发症。使用单变量和多变量统计方法比较两组的结局。
在主要试验中出院后接受随访的1082例患者中,871例行皮下缝合:180例使用4 - 0薇乔缝线,691例使用4 - 0慕丝线。接受氯己定 - 酒精或碘 - 酒精准备的女性中,薇乔缝线或慕丝线皮下缝合无显著差异(51.1%对49.4%,P = 0.67)。与使用慕丝线闭合的女性相比,使用薇乔缝线闭合的女性手术部位感染风险无显著差异(11例[6.1%]对35例[5.1%];P = 0.58;校正比值比,1.23;95%置信区间,0.60 - 2.49)。其他伤口并发症发生率也无显著差异。在所有评估的亚组中,薇乔缝线和慕丝线闭合的手术部位感染风险相似。糖尿病或肥胖是否存在、剖宫产是择期还是非择期、初次剖宫产还是再次剖宫产,以及皮下层是否闭合,均未对相对风险产生实质性影响。事后效能分析表明,我们有80%的效能检测到手术部位感染有>2倍的差异。
4 - 0薇乔缝线皮下缝合与4 - 0慕丝线皮下缝合在手术部位感染率和其他伤口并发症方面相当。虽然这是一项存在选择偏倚和残余混杂可能性的观察性研究,但我们的结果表明,剖宫产皮下缝线材料的选择,医生的偏好是可以接受的。