Suppr超能文献

弗里尔无氧阈测试能否准确检测训练有素的自行车运动员的心率偏转?

Does the Friel Anaerobic Threshold Test Accurately Detect Heart Rate Deflection in Trained Cyclists?

作者信息

Yuen Willie K, Schreiner Shad R, Hoover Donald L, Loudon Janice K, Billinger Sandra A

机构信息

Georgia Holland Research Laboratory, Department of Physical Therapy Education and Rehabilitation Science, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.

Department of Physical Therapy Education, Rockhurst University, Kansas City, MO, USA.

出版信息

Int J Exerc Sci. 2011 Jul 15;4(3):164-175. doi: 10.70252/LYMM9404. eCollection 2011.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

The Friel Anaerobic Threshold Test (FATT) has been used to determine anaerobic threshold (AT). The FATT suggests AT occurs near the heart rate deflection point (HRDP) at a rating of perceived exertion (RPE) of 17.

PURPOSE

The primary purpose of this study was to determine 1) whether the HRDP could be determined using the FATT, 2) examine differences between HRVT and HR that coincided Borg's rating of perceived exertion (RPE) of 17, and 3) if riding position (hoods or aero) would influence performance.

METHODS

Fourteen male cyclists (30.4 ± 7.41years of age; 151.8 ± 60.4 cycled miles/week) participated in the study. Each subject performed the FATT on two occasions within one week.

RESULTS

The findings of this study suggest that the FATT can determine HRDP in trained cyclists while riding in the hoods position but not the aero position. No significant difference was found between the hoods and aero position for HRVT as measured by the metabolic cart. Our data suggest that HR at an RPE of 15 more accurately reflects the HRVT than the RPE of 17. A low, non-significant correlation was found for both the hoods and aero (0.41 and 0.44, respectively; p > 0.20) for the HR at RPE of 17.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study suggest that the FATT can determine HRDP in trained cyclists. However, HRDP was identified in the cyclists preferred riding position. When performing the FATT, HRVT at an RPE of 15 should be used to estimate VT over the suggested RPE of 17.

摘要

未标注

弗里尔无氧阈测试(FATT)已被用于确定无氧阈(AT)。FATT表明无氧阈出现在心率偏转点(HRDP)附近,此时自觉用力程度(RPE)为17。

目的

本研究的主要目的是确定:1)是否可以使用FATT来确定心率偏转点;2)研究与博格自觉用力程度(RPE)为17时相吻合的心率变异性(HRVT)和心率之间的差异;3)骑行姿势(车把位或气动位)是否会影响表现。

方法

14名男性自行车运动员(年龄30.4±7.41岁;每周骑行151.8±6.04英里)参与了该研究。每位受试者在一周内分两次进行FATT测试。

结果

本研究结果表明,FATT能够在训练有素的自行车运动员处于车把位骑行时确定心率偏转点,但在气动位骑行时则无法确定。通过代谢分析仪测得的心率变异性在车把位和气动位之间未发现显著差异。我们的数据表明,自觉用力程度为15时的心率比自觉用力程度为17时更准确地反映心率变异性。在自觉用力程度为17时,车把位和气动位的心率均存在较低的、不显著的相关性(分别为0.41和0.44;p>0.20)。

结论

本研究结果表明,FATT能够在训练有素的自行车运动员中确定心率偏转点。然而,心率偏转点是在自行车运动员偏好的骑行姿势中确定的。进行FATT测试时,应使用自觉用力程度为15时的心率变异性来估计无氧阈,而非建议的自觉用力程度为17时的心率变异性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验