Mohan Arathi, Guerron Alfredo D, Karam Paul A, Worley Sarah, Seifarth Federico G
School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Duke Center for Metabolic and Weight Loss Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
JSLS. 2016 Apr-Jun;20(2). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2016.00020.
To compare surgical outcomes of overweight and obese patients with acute appendicitis who have undergone single-port extracorporeal laparoscopically assisted appendectomy (SP) with those who have had conventional 3-port laparoscopic appendectomy (TP).
This single-center retrospective chart review included patients 21 years of age and younger with a preoperative diagnosis of appendicitis who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy from January 2010 through December 2015. Cases of gangrenous and perforated appendicitis were excluded. Subgroup analyses of patients with acute appendicitis were performed. Operative time (OT), length of stay (LOS), and cost were compared between groups stratified by body mass index (BMI) and operative technique.
A total of 625 appendectomies were performed-457 for acute appendicitis. Sixty-eight patients were overweight. The SP technique (n = 30) had shorter OT (median minutes, 41 vs 68; P < .001), lower cost (median , $5741 vs $8530; P < .001), and shorter LOS (median hours, 16 vs 19; P = .045) than the TP technique had (n = 38). Seventy patients were obese: 19 were treated with SP and 51 with TP. LOS did not differ significantly between the SP and TP groups, but subjects treated with SP had shorter OT (median minutes, 39 vs 63; P < .001) and lower cost (median, $6401 vs $8205; P = .043).
The SP technique for acute appendicitis was found to have a significantly shorter OT and lower cost in all weight groups. There were minimal differences in LOS. SP should be considered in patients with acute appendicitis, regardless of their weight.
比较超重和肥胖的急性阑尾炎患者接受单孔体外腹腔镜辅助阑尾切除术(SP)与传统三孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术(TP)的手术效果。
本单中心回顾性病历审查纳入了2010年1月至2015年12月期间接受腹腔镜阑尾切除术、术前诊断为阑尾炎的21岁及以下患者。坏疽性和穿孔性阑尾炎病例被排除。对急性阑尾炎患者进行亚组分析。比较按体重指数(BMI)和手术技术分层的组间手术时间(OT)、住院时间(LOS)和费用。
共进行了625例阑尾切除术,其中457例为急性阑尾炎。68例患者超重。与TP技术组(n = 38)相比,SP技术组(n = 30)的OT更短(中位数分钟,41对68;P <.001)、费用更低(中位数,5741美元对8530美元;P <.001)且LOS更短(中位数小时,16对19;P =.045)。70例患者肥胖:19例接受SP治疗,51例接受TP治疗。SP组和TP组的LOS无显著差异,但接受SP治疗的患者OT更短(中位数分钟,39对63;P <.001)且费用更低(中位数,6401美元对8205美元;P =.043)。
发现急性阑尾炎的SP技术在所有体重组中OT显著更短且费用更低。LOS差异极小。无论体重如何,急性阑尾炎患者均应考虑采用SP技术。