Suppr超能文献

超重和肥胖儿童的腹腔镜体外阑尾切除术

Laparoscopic Extracorporeal Appendectomy in Overweight and Obese Children.

作者信息

Mohan Arathi, Guerron Alfredo D, Karam Paul A, Worley Sarah, Seifarth Federico G

机构信息

School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Duke Center for Metabolic and Weight Loss Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.

出版信息

JSLS. 2016 Apr-Jun;20(2). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2016.00020.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

To compare surgical outcomes of overweight and obese patients with acute appendicitis who have undergone single-port extracorporeal laparoscopically assisted appendectomy (SP) with those who have had conventional 3-port laparoscopic appendectomy (TP).

METHODS

This single-center retrospective chart review included patients 21 years of age and younger with a preoperative diagnosis of appendicitis who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy from January 2010 through December 2015. Cases of gangrenous and perforated appendicitis were excluded. Subgroup analyses of patients with acute appendicitis were performed. Operative time (OT), length of stay (LOS), and cost were compared between groups stratified by body mass index (BMI) and operative technique.

RESULTS

A total of 625 appendectomies were performed-457 for acute appendicitis. Sixty-eight patients were overweight. The SP technique (n = 30) had shorter OT (median minutes, 41 vs 68; P < .001), lower cost (median , $5741 vs $8530; P < .001), and shorter LOS (median hours, 16 vs 19; P = .045) than the TP technique had (n = 38). Seventy patients were obese: 19 were treated with SP and 51 with TP. LOS did not differ significantly between the SP and TP groups, but subjects treated with SP had shorter OT (median minutes, 39 vs 63; P < .001) and lower cost (median, $6401 vs $8205; P = .043).

CONCLUSIONS

The SP technique for acute appendicitis was found to have a significantly shorter OT and lower cost in all weight groups. There were minimal differences in LOS. SP should be considered in patients with acute appendicitis, regardless of their weight.

摘要

背景与目的

比较超重和肥胖的急性阑尾炎患者接受单孔体外腹腔镜辅助阑尾切除术(SP)与传统三孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术(TP)的手术效果。

方法

本单中心回顾性病历审查纳入了2010年1月至2015年12月期间接受腹腔镜阑尾切除术、术前诊断为阑尾炎的21岁及以下患者。坏疽性和穿孔性阑尾炎病例被排除。对急性阑尾炎患者进行亚组分析。比较按体重指数(BMI)和手术技术分层的组间手术时间(OT)、住院时间(LOS)和费用。

结果

共进行了625例阑尾切除术,其中457例为急性阑尾炎。68例患者超重。与TP技术组(n = 38)相比,SP技术组(n = 30)的OT更短(中位数分钟,41对68;P <.001)、费用更低(中位数,5741美元对8530美元;P <.001)且LOS更短(中位数小时,16对19;P =.045)。70例患者肥胖:19例接受SP治疗,51例接受TP治疗。SP组和TP组的LOS无显著差异,但接受SP治疗的患者OT更短(中位数分钟,39对63;P <.001)且费用更低(中位数,6401美元对8205美元;P =.043)。

结论

发现急性阑尾炎的SP技术在所有体重组中OT显著更短且费用更低。LOS差异极小。无论体重如何,急性阑尾炎患者均应考虑采用SP技术。

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic Extracorporeal Appendectomy in Overweight and Obese Children.
JSLS. 2016 Apr-Jun;20(2). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2016.00020.
2
Transumbilical laparoscopically assisted extracorporeal appendectomy in children and young adults: A retrospective cohort study.
Int J Surg. 2016 Dec;36(Pt A):261-264. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.11.004. Epub 2016 Nov 2.
3
Comparison of Transumbilical Laparoscopically Assisted Appendectomy to Conventional Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Children.
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2016 Dec;26(6):508-512. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000334.
4
Transumbilical extracorporeal laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy.
J Pediatr Surg. 2018 Feb;53(2):256-259. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.11.012. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
6
Obesity and single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy in children.
J Surg Res. 2016 Jun 15;203(2):283-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.03.039. Epub 2016 Mar 26.
8
Single-Incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Children And Conversion to Multiport Appendectomy.
J Surg Res. 2019 Mar;235:223-226. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.08.050. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
9
Laparoscopic appendectomy for simple and perforated appendicitis in children: the procedure of choice?
J Pediatr Surg. 2000 Nov;35(11):1582-5. doi: 10.1053/jpsu.2000.18319.
10
A cost and outcome analysis of pediatric single-incision appendectomy.
J Surg Res. 2016 Jun 15;203(2):253-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.04.033. Epub 2016 Apr 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Children: Tunisian Experience.
Turk Arch Pediatr. 2024 Nov 1;59(6):586-590. doi: 10.5152/TurkArchPediatr.2024.24065.

本文引用的文献

1
Transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy is associated with lower costs compared to multiport laparoscopic appendectomy.
J Pediatr Surg. 2014 Oct;49(10):1508-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2014.03.016. Epub 2014 Apr 24.
3
Prevalence of childhood and adult obesity in the United States, 2011-2012.
JAMA. 2014 Feb 26;311(8):806-14. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.732.
5
Appendicitis in obese children.
Pediatr Surg Int. 2013 Jun;29(6):537-44. doi: 10.1007/s00383-013-3289-5. Epub 2013 Mar 10.
6
A simple postoperative umbilical negative-pressure dressing.
Adv Skin Wound Care. 2013 Jan;26(1):26-9. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000425937.02498.87.
9
The "all-in-one" appendectomy: quick, scarless, and less costly.
J Pediatr Surg. 2011 Dec;46(12):2336-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2011.09.029.
10
Transumbilical laparoscopically assisted appendectomy in children: the results of a single-port, single-channel procedure.
Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb;26(2):523-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1912-x. Epub 2011 Sep 23.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验