Willoughby Ashley D, Lim Robert B, Lustik Michael B
Department of Surgery/General Surgery, Tripler Army Medical Center, 1 Jarrett White Road, Tripler AMC, HI, 96859, USA.
Department of Clinical Investigation/Statistics, Tripler Army Medical Center, 1 Jarrett White Road, Tripler AMC, HI, 96859, USA.
Surg Endosc. 2017 Jan;31(1):206-214. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4958-y. Epub 2016 May 18.
Open inguinal hernia repair is felt to be a less expensive operation than a laparoscopic one. Performing open repair on patients with an obese body mass index (BMI) results in longer operative times, longer hospital stay, and complications that will potentially impose higher cost to the facility and patient. This study aims to define the ideal BMI at which a laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair will be advantageous over open inguinal hernia repair.
The NSQIP database was analyzed for (n = 64,501) complications, mortality, and operating time for open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairs during the time period from 2005 to 2012. Bilateral and recurrent hernias were excluded. Chi-square tests and Fisher's exact tests were used to assess associations between type of surgery and categorical variables including demographics, risk factors, and 30-day outcomes. Multivariable regression analyses were performed to determine whether odds ratios differed by level of BMI. The HCUP database was used for determining difference in cost and length of stay between open and laparoscopic procedures.
There were 17,919 laparoscopic repairs and 46,582 open repairs in the study period. The overall morbidity (across all BMI categories) is statistically greater in the open repair group when compared to the laparoscopic group (p = 0.03). Postoperative complications (including wound disruption, failure to wean from the ventilator, and UTI) were greater in the open repair group across all BMI categories. Deep incisional surgical site infections (SSI) were more common in the overweight open repair group (p = 0.026). The return to the operating room across all BMI categories was statistically significant for the open repair group (n = 269) compared to the laparoscopic repair group (n = 70) with p = 0.003. There was no difference in the return to operating room between the BMI categories. The odds ratio (OR) was found to be statistically significant when comparing the obese category to both normal and overweight populations for the open procedure.
Open hernia repairs have more complications than do laparoscopic ones; however, there does not appear to be a difference in treating obese patients with hernias using a laparoscopic approach versus an open one. One may consider using a laparoscopic approach in overweight patients (BMI 25-29.9) as there appears to be fewer deep SSI.
开放腹股沟疝修补术被认为是一种比腹腔镜手术成本更低的手术。对体重指数(BMI)较高的患者进行开放修补术会导致手术时间延长、住院时间延长以及并发症增多,这可能会给医疗机构和患者带来更高的成本。本研究旨在确定腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术比开放腹股沟疝修补术更具优势的理想BMI。
分析2005年至2012年期间NSQIP数据库中(n = 64,501)开放和腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术的并发症、死亡率及手术时间。排除双侧疝和复发性疝。采用卡方检验和Fisher精确检验评估手术类型与分类变量(包括人口统计学、危险因素和30天结局)之间的关联。进行多变量回归分析以确定比值比是否因BMI水平而异。使用HCUP数据库确定开放手术和腹腔镜手术在成本和住院时间方面的差异。
研究期间有17,919例腹腔镜修补术和46,582例开放修补术。与腹腔镜组相比,开放修补组的总体发病率(所有BMI类别)在统计学上更高(p = 0.03)。在所有BMI类别中,开放修补组的术后并发症(包括伤口裂开、脱机失败和尿路感染)更多。超重开放修补组的深部切口手术部位感染(SSI)更为常见(p = 0.026)。与腹腔镜修补组(n = 70)相比,开放修补组(n = 269)在所有BMI类别中返回手术室的情况在统计学上具有显著差异,p = 0.003。BMI类别之间返回手术室的情况没有差异。在比较肥胖类别与正常和超重人群的开放手术时,发现比值比(OR)在统计学上具有显著意义。
开放疝修补术的并发症比腹腔镜手术更多;然而,使用腹腔镜方法与开放方法治疗肥胖疝患者似乎没有差异。对于超重患者(BMI 25 - 29.9),由于深部SSI似乎较少,可以考虑使用腹腔镜方法。