Baltzell Lucas S, Horton Cort, Shen Yi, Richards Virginia M, D'Zmura Michael, Srinivasan Ramesh
Department of Cognitive Sciences, University of California, Irvine, CA, United States.
Department of Cognitive Sciences, University of California, Irvine, CA, United States.
Brain Res. 2016 Aug 1;1644:203-12. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2016.05.029. Epub 2016 May 16.
Recent studies have uncovered a neural response that appears to track the envelope of speech, and have shown that this tracking process is mediated by attention. It has been argued that this tracking reflects a process of phase-locking to the fluctuations of stimulus energy, ensuring that this energy arrives during periods of high neuronal excitability. Because all acoustic stimuli are decomposed into spectral channels at the cochlea, and this spectral decomposition is maintained along the ascending auditory pathway and into auditory cortex, we hypothesized that the overall stimulus envelope is not as relevant to cortical processing as the individual frequency channels; attention may be mediating envelope tracking differentially across these spectral channels. To test this we reanalyzed data reported by Horton et al. (2013), where high-density EEG was recorded while adults attended to one of two competing naturalistic speech streams. In order to simulate cochlear filtering, the stimuli were passed through a gammatone filterbank, and temporal envelopes were extracted at each filter output. Following Horton et al. (2013), the attended and unattended envelopes were cross-correlated with the EEG, and local maxima were extracted at three different latency ranges corresponding to distinct peaks in the cross-correlation function (N1, P2, and N2). We found that the ratio between the attended and unattended cross-correlation functions varied across frequency channels in the N1 latency range, consistent with the hypothesis that attention differentially modulates envelope-tracking activity across spectral channels.
最近的研究发现了一种似乎能追踪语音包络的神经反应,并表明这种追踪过程是由注意力介导的。有人认为,这种追踪反映了一种与刺激能量波动锁相的过程,确保这种能量在神经元兴奋性较高的时期到达。由于所有声学刺激在耳蜗处都会被分解为频谱通道,并且这种频谱分解会沿着听觉上行通路一直保持到听觉皮层,因此我们推测,总体刺激包络与各个频率通道相比,对皮层处理的相关性没那么大;注意力可能在这些频谱通道上对包络追踪进行差异性调节。为了验证这一点,我们重新分析了霍顿等人(2013年)报告的数据,在该研究中,当成年人专注于两个相互竞争的自然语音流中的一个时,记录了高密度脑电图。为了模拟耳蜗滤波,将刺激通过一个伽马通滤波器组,并在每个滤波器输出处提取时间包络。按照霍顿等人(2013年)的方法,将被关注和未被关注的包络与脑电图进行互相关,并在与互相关函数中不同峰值相对应的三个不同潜伏期范围内提取局部最大值(N1、P2和N2)。我们发现,在N1潜伏期范围内,被关注和未被关注的互相关函数之间的比率在不同频率通道上有所变化,这与注意力在不同频谱通道上差异性调节包络追踪活动的假设一致。