Luther David A, Brooks Thomas M, Butchart Stuart H M, Hayward Matt W, Kester Marieke E, Lamoreux John, Upgren Amy
George Mason University, 4400 University Drive, MS 3E1, Fairfax, VA, 22030, U.S.A..
International Union for Conservation of Nature, Rue Mauverney 28, 1196, Gland, Switzerland.
Conserv Biol. 2016 Dec;30(6):1338-1346. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12757. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
Conservation actions, such as habitat protection, attempt to halt the loss of threatened species and help their populations recover. The efficiency and the effectiveness of actions have been examined individually. However, conservation actions generally occur simultaneously, so the full suite of implemented conservation actions should be assessed. We used the conservation actions underway for all threatened and near-threatened birds of the world (International Union for Conservation of Nature Red List of Threatened Species) to assess which biological (related to taxonomy and ecology) and anthropogenic (related to geoeconomics) factors were associated with the implementation of different classes of conservation actions. We also assessed which conservation actions were associated with population increases in the species targeted. Extinction-risk category was the strongest single predictor of the type of conservation actions implemented, followed by landmass type (continent, oceanic island, etc.) and generation length. Species targeted by invasive nonnative species control or eradication programs, ex situ conservation, international legislation, reintroduction, or education, and awareness-raising activities were more likely to have increasing populations. These results illustrate the importance of developing a predictive science of conservation actions and the relative benefits of each class of implemented conservation action for threatened and near-threatened birds worldwide.
诸如栖息地保护等保护行动试图阻止濒危物种数量的减少,并帮助其种群数量恢复。人们已分别对这些行动的效率和效果进行了研究。然而,保护行动通常是同时开展的,因此应该对已实施的整套保护行动进行评估。我们利用针对世界上所有濒危和近危鸟类(国际自然保护联盟濒危物种红色名录)正在开展的保护行动,来评估哪些生物学因素(与分类学和生态学相关)和人为因素(与地缘经济学相关)与不同类别的保护行动实施有关。我们还评估了哪些保护行动与目标物种的种群数量增加有关。灭绝风险类别是所实施保护行动类型的最强单一预测指标,其次是陆地块体类型(大陆、海洋岛屿等)和世代长度。受到入侵非本地物种控制或根除计划、迁地保护、国际立法、重新引入或教育及提高认识活动影响的目标物种,其种群数量更有可能增加。这些结果说明了发展保护行动预测科学的重要性,以及各类已实施保护行动对全球濒危和近危鸟类的相对益处。