Inzlicht Michael, Marcora Samuele M
Department of Psychology, University of Toronto ScarboroughToronto, ON, Canada; Rotman School of Management, University of TorontoToronto, ON, Canada.
Endurance Research Group, School of Sport and Exercise Sciences, University of Kent at Medway Chatham, England.
Front Psychol. 2016 May 4;7:656. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00656. eCollection 2016.
Self-control is considered broadly important for many domains of life. One of its unfortunate features, however, is that it tends to wane over time, with little agreement about why this is the case. Recently, there has been a push to address this problem by looking to the literature in exercise physiology, specifically the work on the central governor model of physical fatigue. Trying to explain how and why mental performance wanes over time, the central governor model suggests that exertion is throttled by some central nervous system mechanism that receives information about energetic bodily needs and motivational drives to regulate exertion and, ultimately, to prevent homeostatic breakdown, chiefly energy depletion. While we admire the spirit of integration and the attempt to shed light on an important topic in psychology, our concern is that the central governor model is very controversial in exercise physiology, with increasing calls to abandon it altogether, making it a poor fit for psychology. Our concerns are threefold. First, while we agree that preservation of bodily homeostasis makes for an elegant ultimate account, the fact that such important homeostatic concerns can be regularly overturned with even slight incentives (e.g., a smile) renders the ultimate account impotent and points to other ultimate functions for fatigue. Second, despite the central governor being thought to take as input information about the metabolic needs of the body, there is no credible evidence that mental effort actually consumes inordinate amounts of energy that are not already circulating in the brain. Third, recent modifications of the model make the central governor appear like an all-knowing homunculus and unfalsifiable in principle, thus contributing very little to our understanding of why people tend to disengage from effortful tasks over time. We note that the latest models in exercise physiology have actually borrowed concepts and models from psychology to understand physical performance.
自我控制在生活的许多领域都被广泛认为是重要的。然而,它的一个不幸特征是,随着时间的推移,它往往会减弱,对于其原因却几乎没有一致的看法。最近,人们试图通过参考运动生理学文献,特别是关于身体疲劳的中枢调节模型的研究,来解决这个问题。为了解释心理表现如何以及为何会随着时间的推移而下降,中枢调节模型认为,运动是由某种中枢神经系统机制调节的,该机制接收有关身体能量需求和动机驱动的信息,以调节运动,最终防止体内平衡的破坏,主要是能量消耗。虽然我们赞赏这种整合的精神以及试图阐明心理学中一个重要话题的努力,但我们担心的是,中枢调节模型在运动生理学中极具争议性,越来越多的人呼吁完全摒弃它,这使得它不太适合心理学领域。我们的担忧主要有三点。首先,虽然我们同意维持身体内环境稳定是一个优雅的最终解释,但这样重要的内环境稳定问题甚至会因轻微的激励(如一个微笑)而经常被推翻,这使得这个最终解释变得无力,并指向疲劳的其他最终功能。其次,尽管中枢调节机制被认为会接收有关身体代谢需求的信息作为输入,但没有可靠的证据表明脑力劳动实际上消耗了大脑中尚未循环的大量能量。第三,该模型最近的修改使中枢调节机制看起来像一个全知的小矮人,原则上无法被证伪,因此对我们理解为什么人们随着时间的推移往往会放弃费力的任务贡献甚微。我们注意到,运动生理学的最新模型实际上借鉴了心理学的概念和模型来理解身体表现。