Englot Dario J, Birk Harjus, Chang Edward F
Department of Neurological Surgery and UCSF Epilepsy Center, University of California, San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Avenue, Box 0112, M779, San Francisco, CA, 94143-0112, USA.
Neurosurg Rev. 2017 Apr;40(2):181-194. doi: 10.1007/s10143-016-0725-8. Epub 2016 May 21.
In approximately 30 % of patients with epilepsy, seizures are refractory to medical therapy, leading to significant morbidity and increased mortality. Substantial evidence has demonstrated the benefit of surgical resection in patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy, and in the present journal, we recently reviewed seizure outcomes in resective epilepsy surgery. However, not all patients are candidates for or amenable to open surgical resection for epilepsy. Fortunately, several nonresective surgical options are now available at various epilepsy centers, including novel therapies which have been pioneered in recent years. Ablative procedures such as stereotactic laser ablation and stereotactic radiosurgery offer minimally invasive alternatives to open surgery with relatively favorable seizure outcomes, particularly in patients with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. For certain individuals who are not candidates for ablation or resection, palliative neuromodulation procedures such as vagus nerve stimulation, deep brain stimulation, or responsive neurostimulation may result in a significant decrease in seizure frequency and improved quality of life. Finally, disconnection procedures such as multiple subpial transections and corpus callosotomy continue to play a role in select patients with an eloquent epileptogenic zone or intractable atonic seizures, respectively. Overall, open surgical resection remains the gold standard treatment for drug-resistant epilepsy, although it is significantly underutilized. While nonresective epilepsy procedures have not replaced the need for resection, there is hope that these additional surgical options will increase the number of patients who receive treatment for this devastating disorder-particularly individuals who are not candidates for or who have failed resection.
在大约30%的癫痫患者中,癫痫发作对药物治疗无效,导致严重的发病率和死亡率上升。大量证据表明,手术切除对耐药性局灶性癫痫患者有益,在本期刊中,我们最近回顾了切除性癫痫手术的发作结果。然而,并非所有患者都适合或能够接受癫痫的开放性手术切除。幸运的是,现在各个癫痫中心都有几种非切除性手术选择,包括近年来开创的新型疗法。立体定向激光消融和立体定向放射外科等消融手术为开放性手术提供了微创替代方案,癫痫发作结果相对较好,尤其是在颞叶内侧癫痫患者中。对于某些不适合消融或切除的个体,迷走神经刺激、深部脑刺激或反应性神经刺激等姑息性神经调节手术可能会导致癫痫发作频率显著降低并改善生活质量。最后,多软膜下横切术和胼胝体切开术等离断手术分别在有明确致痫区的特定患者或难治性失张力性癫痫发作患者中继续发挥作用。总体而言,开放性手术切除仍然是耐药性癫痫的金标准治疗方法,尽管其使用率明显不足。虽然非切除性癫痫手术并未取代切除的必要性,但人们希望这些额外的手术选择将增加接受这种毁灭性疾病治疗的患者数量,特别是那些不适合或切除失败的个体。