Ptaszek Leon M, White Benjamin, Lubitz Steven A, Carnicelli Anthony P, Heist E Kevin, Ellinor Patrick T, Machado Monique, Wasfy Jason H, Ruskin Jeremy N, Armstrong Katrina, Brown David F, Biddinger Paul D, Mansour Moussa
Cardiac Arrhythmia Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Cardiology Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Am J Cardiol. 2016 Jul 1;118(1):64-71. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.04.014. Epub 2016 Apr 21.
Management of atrial fibrillation (AF) in the emergency department (ED) is variable because of the absence of universally adopted treatment guidelines. To address potentially preventable hospital admissions and prolonged length of stay, an AF treatment pathway was co-developed by physicians from the cardiac electrophysiology service and the department of emergency medicine at our institution. The impact of this AF pathway on patient outcomes was evaluated with a prospective, observational study conducted in a single tertiary care center from July 1, 2013, to June 30, 2014. The primary study outcome was the rate of hospital admission. The secondary outcomes were duration of ED visit and inpatient length of stay. The 94 patients treated according to the AF pathway during the study period were less likely to be admitted than the 265 patients who received routine care (16% vs 80%, p <0.001). For admitted patients, the mean length of stay was shorter for patients treated according to the AF pathway (32 vs 85 hours, p = 0.002). The time spent in the ED was longer for patients in the AF pathway (16 vs 85 hours, p <0.001). Utilization of a multidisciplinary pathway for management of AF in the ED led to a significant reduction in the rate of hospital admission. Patients who were admitted after receiving care according to the AF pathway had a shorter length of stay. In conclusion, utilization of a multidisciplinary AF pathway resulted in a 5-fold reduction in admission rate and >2-fold reduction length of stay for admitted patients.
由于缺乏普遍采用的治疗指南,急诊科(ED)对心房颤动(AF)的管理存在差异。为了解决潜在的可预防的住院和住院时间延长问题,我院心脏电生理科和急诊科的医生共同制定了房颤治疗路径。通过在2013年7月1日至2014年6月30日期间在一家三级医疗中心进行的前瞻性观察性研究,评估了该房颤治疗路径对患者预后的影响。主要研究结局是住院率。次要结局是急诊就诊时间和住院时间。研究期间按照房颤治疗路径治疗的94例患者比265例接受常规治疗的患者入院可能性更小(16%对80%,p<0.001)。对于入院患者,按照房颤治疗路径治疗的患者平均住院时间更短(32小时对85小时,p = 0.002)。房颤治疗路径组患者在急诊室花费的时间更长(16小时对85小时,p<0.001)。在急诊科采用多学科房颤治疗路径可显著降低住院率。接受房颤治疗路径护理后入院的患者住院时间更短。总之,采用多学科房颤治疗路径使入院率降低了5倍,使入院患者的住院时间缩短了2倍以上。