Sheiban Imad, Moretti Claudio, D'Ascenzo Fabrizio, Chieffo Alaide, Taha Salma, Connor Stephen O, Chandran SujaySubash, de la Torre Hernández J M, Chen Sl, Varbella Ferdinando, Omedè Pierluigi, Iannaccone Mario, Meliga Emanuele, Kawamoto Hiroyoshi, Montefusco Antonio, Mervyn Chong, Garot Philippe, Sin Lin, Gasparetto Valeria, Abdirashid Mohamed, Cerrato Enrico, Biondi Zoccai Giuseppe, Gaita Fiorenzo, Escaned Javier, Hiddick Smith David, Lefèvre Thierry, Colombo Antonio
Division of Cardiology, Department of Science, Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy; Division di Cardiologia, Ospedale Pederzoli, Verona, Italy.
Division of Cardiology, Department of Science, Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy.
Am J Cardiol. 2016 Jul 1;118(1):32-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.04.007. Epub 2016 Apr 26.
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of unprotected left main disease (ULM) with drug-eluting stents (DES) is hampered by lack of information on long-term (≥10 years) safety data. All patients treated with PCI on ULM in 9 international centers with at least 10 years follow-up were enrolled. Baseline and procedural features were recorded. Repeat PCI (re-PCI) on ULM at 10 years was the primary end point. Secondary end points included major adverse cardiac events and its components (cardiac and noncardiac death, myocardial infarction, re-PCI not on ULM, and stent thrombosis). Sensitivity analysis was performed according to the presence of isolated ULM disease: 284 patients were enrolled. A total of 70 patients (21%) performed a re-PCI on ULM, 39 in the first year, and 31 between 1 and 10 years (only 5 overall performed for acute coronary syndrome). Patients with re-PCI on ULM did not show differences in baseline and procedural features, or experience higher rates of cardiovascular death (12% vs 11%, p 0.65), myocardial infarction (11% vs 6%, p 0.56), or of re-PCI on non-ULM disease (31% vs 27%, p 0.76) compared with those without re-PCI on ULM. At Kaplan-Meier analysis, patients with PCI in other coronary vessels were at higher risk of major adverse cardiac events, driven by target vessel revascularization (20.4% vs 32.9%, p 0.009), as confirmed at multivariate analysis (stenosis other than LM; hazard ratio 2, 1.4 to 2.7, all CI 95%). In conclusion, despite of using first-generation stents, PCI on ULM is safe, with low rates of recurrent events due to index revascularization. Progression of atherosclerotic lesions on other coronary vessels represents the only independent predictive factor for prognosis.
药物洗脱支架(DES)用于无保护左主干病变(ULM)的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)因缺乏长期(≥10年)安全性数据而受到阻碍。纳入了9个国际中心接受ULM的PCI治疗且随访至少10年的所有患者。记录基线和手术特征。10年时对ULM进行再次PCI(re-PCI)是主要终点。次要终点包括主要不良心脏事件及其组成部分(心脏和非心脏死亡、心肌梗死、非ULM部位的再次PCI以及支架血栓形成)。根据孤立性ULM疾病的存在进行敏感性分析:共纳入284例患者。共有70例患者(21%)对ULM进行了再次PCI,39例在第一年进行,31例在1至10年之间进行(总体仅5例因急性冠状动脉综合征进行)。与未对ULM进行再次PCI的患者相比,对ULM进行再次PCI的患者在基线和手术特征方面没有差异,心血管死亡发生率(12%对11%,p = 0.65)、心肌梗死发生率(11%对6%,p = 0.56)或非ULM疾病再次PCI发生率(31%对27%,p = 0.76)也没有更高。在Kaplan-Meier分析中,其他冠状动脉血管进行PCI的患者发生主要不良心脏事件的风险更高,主要由靶血管血运重建导致(20.4%对32.9%,p = 0.009),多变量分析也证实了这一点(LM以外的狭窄;风险比2,1.4至2.7,所有CI 95%)。总之,尽管使用的是第一代支架,但ULM的PCI是安全的,因首次血运重建导致的复发事件发生率较低。其他冠状动脉血管粥样硬化病变的进展是唯一独立的预后预测因素。