Suppr超能文献

“欲壑难填”:一种探索多种意图与行为之间关系的新颖研究范式。

"You Can't Always Get What You Want": A Novel Research Paradigm to Explore the Relationship between Multiple Intentions and Behaviours.

机构信息

Newcastle University, UK.

Fuse: The UK CRC Centre of Excellence for Translational Research in Public Health, Newcastle University, UK.

出版信息

Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2016 Jul;8(2):258-75. doi: 10.1111/aphw.12071. Epub 2016 May 27.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Research investigating cognitive moderators of the intention-behaviour relationship and psychological consequences of failure to enact intentions is usually conducted in a single-behaviour paradigm. A multiple-behaviour paradigm is introduced which overcomes bias inherent to single-behaviour designs and allows testing of novel hypotheses. Two exploratory studies illustrate the utility of this new paradigm by investigating the role of cognitive predictors and psychological correlates of intention-behaviour relationships.

METHOD

The proposed method involves measuring multiple intentions across common areas of life activity at baseline and corresponding behaviours at follow-up. In two studies, 51 intentions and behaviours were assessed (49 by self-report, 2 objectively). In Study 1, participants (n = 126) also completed self-reported measures of everyday cognitive failures and dysexecutive behaviours, crystallised intelligence (Mill Hill Vocabulary Scale) at baseline and Quality of Life (QoL; follow-up). In Study 2, objective executive function measures (Stroop, Go/NoGo task and Word Fluency test) were completed by N = 30 participants.

RESULTS

The total number of intentions, cognitive, and QoL measures were unrelated to the percentage of intentions enacted. Crystallised intelligence was related to successful intention implementation and problems with emotion regulation were associated with forming fewer intentions and with fewer failed intentions. QoL was strongly related with more intentions, regardless of whether or not these were implemented. Study 2 showed that cognitive flexibility (word fluency) and task errors, rather than Stroop effect and Go/No-Go performance were related, to intention-behaviour congruence.

CONCLUSION

Intention-behaviour relationships might be better understood when considering the multiple intentions and behaviours that people are engaged in at once at any one point in time. A multiple-behaviour paradigm suggests novel hypotheses. Preliminary findings reported here require replication. Anticipated applications of the paradigm are outlined and discussed.

摘要

目的

研究考察了意向-行为关系的认知调节因素以及未能实施意向的心理后果,通常是在单一行为范式中进行的。引入了一种多行为范式,该范式克服了单一行为设计固有的偏差,并允许测试新的假设。通过研究意向-行为关系的认知预测因子和心理相关性,两项探索性研究说明了这种新范式的实用性。

方法

该方法涉及在基线时测量生活活动的多个常见领域的多个意向,在随访时测量相应的行为。在两项研究中,评估了 51 个意向和行为(49 个自我报告,2 个客观)。在研究 1 中,参与者(n=126)还在基线时完成了日常认知失败和执行力障碍、晶体智力(密尔山词汇量表)以及生活质量(QoL;随访)的自我报告测量。在研究 2 中,30 名参与者完成了客观的执行功能测量(Stroop、Go/NoGo 任务和词汇流畅性测试)。

结果

意向、认知和 QoL 测量的总数与实施意向的百分比无关。晶体智力与成功实施意向有关,情绪调节问题与形成较少的意向和较少的失败意向有关。QoL 与更多的意向强烈相关,无论这些意向是否得到实施。研究 2 表明,意向-行为一致性与认知灵活性(词汇流畅性)和任务错误有关,而不是 Stroop 效应和 Go/No-Go 表现。

结论

当考虑到人们在任何特定时间同时参与的多个意向和行为时,可能会更好地理解意向-行为关系。多行为范式提出了新的假设。这里报告的初步发现需要复制。概述并讨论了该范式的预期应用。

相似文献

1
"You Can't Always Get What You Want": A Novel Research Paradigm to Explore the Relationship between Multiple Intentions and Behaviours.
Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2016 Jul;8(2):258-75. doi: 10.1111/aphw.12071. Epub 2016 May 27.
3
Closing the intention-behaviour gap for sunscreen use and sun protection behaviours.
Psychol Health. 2013;28(5):477-94. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2012.745935. Epub 2012 Dec 19.
5
Combining self-affirmation and implementation intentions to reduce heavy episodic drinking in university students.
Psychol Addict Behav. 2016 Jun;30(4):434-41. doi: 10.1037/adb0000144. Epub 2015 Dec 21.
8
Evaluation of an implementation intentions intervention for managing university student stress.
Stress Health. 2024 Jun;40(3):e3318. doi: 10.1002/smi.3318. Epub 2023 Sep 19.
10
The temporal stability and predictive validity of affect-based and cognition-based intentions.
Br J Soc Psychol. 2014 Jun;53(2):315-27. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12034. Epub 2013 Apr 19.

本文引用的文献

2
Mapping health behaviors: Constructing and validating a common-sense taxonomy of health behaviors.
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Dec;146:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.10.004. Epub 2015 Oct 9.
3
The theory of planned behaviour is alive and well, and not ready to retire: a commentary on Sniehotta, Presseau, and Araújo-Soares.
Health Psychol Rev. 2015;9(2):131-7. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2014.883474. Epub 2014 Feb 12.
4
Beyond single behaviour theory: Adding cross-behaviour cognitions to the health action process approach.
Br J Health Psychol. 2015 Nov;20(4):824-41. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12144. Epub 2015 Jun 25.
6
On the development, evaluation and evolution of health behaviour theory.
Health Psychol Rev. 2015;9(2):176-89. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2015.1022902. Epub 2015 Jul 6.
7
A bidirectional relationship between physical activity and executive function in older adults.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Jan 13;8:1044. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.01044. eCollection 2014.
10

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验