Saad-Haddad Ghada, DeJong Jocelyn, Terreri Nancy, Restrepo-Méndez María Clara, Perin Jamie, Vaz Lara, Newby Holly, Amouzou Agbessi, Barros Aluísio Jd, Bryce Jennifer
Faculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Independent consultant.
J Glob Health. 2016 Jun;6(1):010404. doi: 10.7189/jogh.06.010404.
Antenatal care (ANC) is critical for improving maternal and newborn health. WHO recommends that pregnant women complete at least four ANC visits. Countdown and other global monitoring efforts track the proportions of women who receive one or more visits by a skilled provider (ANC1+) and four or more visits by any provider (ANC4+). This study investigates patterns of drop-off in use between ANC1+ and ANC4+, and explores inequalities in women's use of ANC services. It also identifies determinants of utilization and describes countries' ANC-related policies, and programs.
We performed secondary analyses using Demographic Health Survey (DHS) data from seven Countdown countries: Bangladesh, Cambodia, Cameroon, Nepal, Peru, Senegal and Uganda. The descriptive analysis illustrates country variations in the frequency of visits by provider type, content, and by household wealth, women's education and type of residence. We conducted a multivariable analysis using a conceptual framework to identify determinants of ANC utilization. We collected contextual information from countries through a standard questionnaire completed by country-based informants.
Each country had a unique pattern of ANC utilization in terms of coverage, inequality and the extent to which predictors affected the frequency of visits. Nevertheless, common patterns arise. Women having four or more visits usually saw a skilled provider at least once, and received more evidence-based content interventions than women reporting fewer than four visits. A considerable proportion of women reporting four or more visits did not report receiving the essential interventions. Large disparities exist in ANC use by household wealth, women's education and residence area; and are wider for a larger number of visits. The multivariable analyses of two models in each country showed that determinants had different effects on the dependent variable in each model. Overall, strong predictors of ANC initiation and having a higher frequency (4+) of visits were woman's education and household wealth. Gestational age at first visit, birth rank and preceding birth interval were generally negatively associated with initiating visits and with having four or more visits. Information on country policies and programs were somewhat informative in understanding the utilization patterns across the countries, although timing of adoption and actual implementation make direct linkages impossible to verify.
Secondary analyses provided a more detailed picture of ANC utilization patterns in the seven countries. While coverage levels differ by country and sub-groups, all countries can benefit from specific in-country assessments to properly identify the underserved women and the reasons behind low coverage and missed interventions. Overall, emphasis needs to be put on assessing the quality of care offered and identifying women's perception to the care as well as the barriers hindering utilization. Country policies and programs need to be reviewed, evaluated and/or implemented properly to ensure that women receive the recommended number of ANC visits with appropriate content, especially, poor and less educated women residing in rural areas.
产前保健对于改善孕产妇和新生儿健康至关重要。世界卫生组织建议孕妇至少进行四次产前检查。“倒计时”及其他全球监测工作跟踪接受过熟练医护人员一次或多次检查(ANC1+)以及接受过任何医护人员四次或更多次检查(ANC4+)的妇女比例。本研究调查了ANC1+和ANC4+之间使用情况的下降模式,并探讨了妇女在使用产前保健服务方面的不平等现象。它还确定了利用的决定因素,并描述了各国与产前保健相关的政策和项目。
我们使用来自七个“倒计时”国家(孟加拉国、柬埔寨、喀麦隆、尼泊尔、秘鲁、塞内加尔和乌干达)的人口与健康调查(DHS)数据进行了二次分析。描述性分析说明了按医护人员类型、检查内容以及家庭财富、妇女教育程度和居住类型划分的各国就诊频率差异。我们使用一个概念框架进行多变量分析,以确定产前保健利用的决定因素。我们通过由各国信息提供者填写的标准问卷收集了各国的背景信息。
每个国家在产前保健利用的覆盖范围、不平等程度以及预测因素对就诊频率的影响程度方面都有独特的模式。然而,也出现了一些共同模式。进行四次或更多次检查的妇女通常至少有一次接受过熟练医护人员的检查,并且比报告检查次数少于四次的妇女接受了更多基于证据的内容干预。相当一部分报告进行了四次或更多次检查的妇女并未报告接受过基本干预。在产前保健的使用方面,家庭财富、妇女教育程度和居住地区存在很大差异;就诊次数越多,差异越大。对每个国家的两个模型进行的多变量分析表明,决定因素在每个模型中对因变量的影响不同。总体而言,产前保健开始和就诊频率较高(4+)的有力预测因素是妇女的教育程度和家庭财富。首次就诊时的孕周、生育顺序和上次生育间隔通常与开始就诊以及进行四次或更多次就诊呈负相关。关于国家政策和项目的信息在理解各国的利用模式方面有一定帮助,尽管采用时间和实际实施情况使得无法直接验证两者之间的联系。
二次分析提供了七个国家产前保健利用模式的更详细情况。虽然各国和各亚组的覆盖水平有所不同,但所有国家都可以从具体的国内评估中受益,以正确识别服务不足的妇女以及覆盖率低和错过干预措施的原因。总体而言,需要强调评估所提供护理的质量,确定妇女对护理的看法以及阻碍利用的障碍。需要对国家政策和项目进行审查、评估和/或适当实施,以确保妇女接受建议次数的产前检查,并获得适当的检查内容,特别是农村地区的贫困和受教育程度较低的妇女。