Department of Cardiothoracic Anesthesia, Anesthesiology Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio; Department of Outcomes Research, Anesthesiology Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Department of Outcomes Research, Anesthesiology Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Sep;152(3):881-889.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.04.078. Epub 2016 May 5.
Pain after cardiac surgery traditionally has been controlled by intravenous opioids and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. An intravenous analgesic with fewer adverse effects is needed. Therefore, we tested the primary hypothesis that intravenous acetaminophen is more effective than placebo for pain management, which was defined a priori as superior on either pain intensity score and/or opioid consumption and not worse on either.
In this single-center, double-blind trial, 147 patients having cardiac surgery via median sternotomy were randomized to receive either 1 g of intravenous acetaminophen (73 patients) every 6 hours for 24 hours or comparable placebo (74 patients) starting in the operating room after sternal closure. Cumulative opioid consumption (in morphine equivalents) and pain intensity scores (on a 0-10 Numeric Rating Scale) were measured at 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 hours after surgery. We estimated ratio of mean opioid consumption by using multivariable linear regression (noninferiority delta = 1.15) and pain score difference by using repeated measures regression (noninferiority delta = 1).
Acetaminophen was superior to placebo on mean pain intensity scores and noninferior on opioid consumption, with estimated difference in mean pain (95% confidence interval) of -0.90 (-1.39, -0.42), P < .001 (superior), and estimated ratio of means in opioid consumption (90% confidence interval) of 0.89 (0.73-1.10), P = .28 (noninferior; not superior).
Intravenous acetaminophen reduced pain after cardiac surgery, but not opioid consumption. Intravenous acetaminophen can be an effective analgesic adjunct in patients recovering from median sternotomy.
传统上,心脏手术后的疼痛通过静脉内阿片类药物和非甾体抗炎药来控制。需要一种不良反应较少的静脉内镇痛药。因此,我们测试了主要假设,即静脉内对乙酰氨基酚在疼痛管理方面比安慰剂更有效,这是根据预先定义的标准,即疼痛强度评分和/或阿片类药物消耗更高,而不是更差。
在这项单中心、双盲试验中,147 名通过正中胸骨切开术接受心脏手术的患者被随机分配接受每 6 小时静脉注射 1 克对乙酰氨基酚(73 名患者)或在胸骨关闭后开始在手术室接受等效安慰剂(74 名患者),持续 24 小时。在手术后 4、6、8、12、16、20 和 24 小时测量累积阿片类药物消耗(以吗啡等效物计)和疼痛强度评分(0-10 数字评分量表)。我们使用多变量线性回归(非劣效性差值=1.15)估计平均阿片类药物消耗比和使用重复测量回归(非劣效性差值=1)估计疼痛评分差异。
对乙酰氨基酚在平均疼痛强度评分上优于安慰剂,在阿片类药物消耗上具有非劣效性,估计平均疼痛差异(95%置信区间)为-0.90(-1.39,-0.42),P<0.001(优效),和估计的阿片类药物消耗均值比(90%置信区间)为 0.89(0.73-1.10),P=0.28(非劣效;非优效)。
静脉内对乙酰氨基酚减轻了心脏手术后的疼痛,但没有减少阿片类药物的消耗。静脉内对乙酰氨基酚可以成为从正中胸骨切开术恢复的患者的有效镇痛辅助药物。