Watzlawick Ralf, Rind Julian, Sena Emily S, Brommer Benedikt, Zhang Tian, Kopp Marcel A, Dirnagl Ulrich, Macleod Malcolm R, Howells David W, Schwab Jan M
Department of Neurology and Experimental Neurology, Charité Campus Mitte, Clinical and Experimental Spinal Cord Injury Research Laboratory (Neuroparaplegiology), Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
PLoS Biol. 2016 May 31;14(5):e1002468. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002468. eCollection 2016 May.
Olfactory ensheathing cell (OEC) transplantation is a candidate cellular treatment approach for human spinal cord injury (SCI) due to their unique regenerative potential and autologous origin. The objective of this study was, through a meta-epidemiologic approach, (i) to assess the efficacy of OEC transplantation on locomotor recovery after traumatic experimental SCI and (ii) to estimate the likelihood of reporting bias and/or missing data. A study protocol was finalized before data collection. Embedded into a systematic review and meta-analysis, we conducted a literature research of databases including PubMed, EMBASE, and ISI Web of Science from 1949/01 to 2014/10 with no language restrictions, screened by two independent investigators. Studies were included if they assessed neurobehavioral improvement after traumatic experimental SCI, administrated no combined interventions, and reported the number of animals in the treatment and control group. Individual effect sizes were pooled using a random effects model. Details regarding the study design were extracted and impact of these on locomotor outcome was assessed by meta-regression. Missing data (reporting bias) was determined by Egger regression and Funnel-plotting. The primary study outcome assessed was improvement in locomotor function at the final time point of measurement. We included 49 studies (62 experiments, 1,164 animals) in the final analysis. The overall improvement in locomotor function after OEC transplantation, measured using the Basso, Beattie, and Bresnahan (BBB) score, was 20.3% (95% CI 17.8-29.5). One missing study was imputed by trim and fill analysis, suggesting only slight publication bias and reducing the overall effect to a 19.2% improvement of locomotor activity. Dose-response ratio supports neurobiological plausibility. Studies were assessed using a 9-point item quality score, resulting in a median score of 5 (interquartile range [IQR] 3-5). In conclusion, OEC transplantation exerts considerable beneficial effects on neurobehavioral recovery after traumatic experimental SCI. Publication bias was minimal and affirms the translational potential of efficacy, but safety cannot be adequately assessed. The data justify OECs as a cellular substrate to develop and optimize minimally invasive and safe cellular transplantation paradigms for the lesioned spinal cord embedded into state-of-the-art Phase I/II clinical trial design studies for human SCI.
嗅鞘细胞(OEC)移植因其独特的再生潜能和自体来源,是一种用于人类脊髓损伤(SCI)的细胞治疗候选方法。本研究的目的是通过元流行病学方法,(i)评估OEC移植对创伤性实验性SCI后运动功能恢复的疗效,以及(ii)估计报告偏倚和/或数据缺失的可能性。在数据收集前确定了研究方案。我们在一项系统评价和荟萃分析中,对1949年1月至2014年10月期间的PubMed、EMBASE和ISI科学网等数据库进行了无语言限制的文献研究,由两名独立研究人员进行筛选。如果研究评估了创伤性实验性SCI后的神经行为改善,未采用联合干预措施,并报告了治疗组和对照组的动物数量,则纳入研究。使用随机效应模型汇总个体效应量。提取有关研究设计的详细信息,并通过元回归评估这些信息对运动结果的影响。通过Egger回归和漏斗图确定数据缺失(报告偏倚)。评估的主要研究结局是测量最后时间点的运动功能改善情况。最终分析纳入了49项研究(62项实验,1164只动物)。使用Basso、Beattie和Bresnahan(BBB)评分测量,OEC移植后运动功能的总体改善为20.3%(95%CI 17.8 - 29.5)。一项缺失研究通过修剪和填充分析进行估算,表明仅存在轻微的发表偏倚,并将总体效应降低至运动活动改善19.2%。剂量反应比支持神经生物学合理性。使用9分项目质量评分对研究进行评估,中位数评分为5(四分位间距[IQR] 3 - 5)。总之,OEC移植对创伤性实验性SCI后的神经行为恢复具有相当大的有益作用。发表偏倚最小,证实了疗效的转化潜力,但安全性无法得到充分评估。这些数据证明OEC可作为一种细胞基质,用于开发和优化微创且安全的细胞移植模式,应用于针对人类SCI的先进I/II期临床试验设计研究中的损伤脊髓。