Chen Yan, Jiang Lei, Gao Bo, Cheng Zhi-Yuan, Jin Jiaxin, Yang Ke-Hu
The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Evidence Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016 Jun;157(3):517-25. doi: 10.1007/s10549-016-3830-z. Epub 2016 May 31.
The objective of the present meta-analysis was to estimate the magnitude of survival and disease-free benefits from mastectomy compared with breast conservation therapy (BCT) in patients with early breast cancer. We searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Chinese biomedical literature database from their inception to May 2015. All the data were independently extracted from the publications by two reviewers. Results regarding the overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in the meta-analysis were expressed as hazard ratios (HRs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs). Nine randomized control trials were eligible for final meta-analysis. Meta-analysis showed that mastectomy provided significant benefit in OS compared with BCT (HR 1.09, 95 % CI 1.01-1.19; P = 0.03). Sensitivity analysis gives similar OS estimates (HR 1.12, 95 % CI 1.01-1.25). In the subgroup analysis of patients according to tumor size, the pooled HRs for OS indicated that there is a borderline statistical difference between two arms in the subgroup with tumor size ranging between ≥2 cm and <5 cm (HR 1.09, 95 % CI 1.00-1.19), but subgroup analysis of tumor size <2 cm showed no statistically significant difference in OS (HR 1.08, 95 % CI 0.88-1.33) when comparing the BCT arm with the mastectomy arm. There was no significant difference in DFS between BCT and mastectomy groups (HR 1.08, 95 % CI 0.99-1.18; P = 0.08). Sensitivity analysis also gives similar DFS estimates (HR 1.11, 95 % CI 0.96-1.27). Subgroup analysis indicated that the pooled HRs for DFS did not favor mastectomy arm or BCT arm either in the subgroup with tumor size <2 cm (HR 1.09, 95 % CI 0.78-1.52) or in the subgroup with tumor size ranging between ≥2 cm and <5 cm (HR 1.08, 95 % CI 0.99-1.18) according to tumor size. Five-year OS decreased from 70 to 68 % with BCT. The present meta-analysis indicated that mastectomy might provide slight OS benefit compared with BCT in early breast cancer patients with larger tumor size, but the absolute survival gain is small.
本荟萃分析的目的是评估早期乳腺癌患者接受乳房切除术与保乳治疗(BCT)相比,在生存和无病获益方面的程度。我们检索了PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆、科学网以及中国生物医学文献数据库,检索时间从建库至2015年5月。所有数据由两名审阅者独立从出版物中提取。荟萃分析中关于总生存(OS)和无病生存(DFS)的结果以风险比(HRs)及95%置信区间(CIs)表示。九项随机对照试验符合最终荟萃分析的条件。荟萃分析显示,与BCT相比,乳房切除术在OS方面有显著获益(HR 1.09,95% CI 1.01 - 1.19;P = 0.03)。敏感性分析得出类似的OS估计值(HR 1.12,95% CI 1.01 - 1.25)。在根据肿瘤大小对患者进行的亚组分析中,OS的合并HRs表明,肿瘤大小在≥2 cm且<5 cm的亚组中,两组之间存在临界统计学差异(HR 1.09,95% CI 1.00 - 1.19),但当比较BCT组与乳房切除术组时,肿瘤大小<2 cm的亚组在OS方面未显示出统计学显著差异(HR 1.08,95% CI 0.88 - 1.33)。BCT组和乳房切除术组在DFS方面无显著差异(HR 1.08,95% CI 0.99 - 1.18;P = 0.08)。敏感性分析也得出类似的DFS估计值(HR 1.11,95% CI 0.96 - 1.27)。亚组分析表明,根据肿瘤大小,在肿瘤大小<2 cm的亚组(HR 1.09,95% CI 0.78 - 1.52)或肿瘤大小在≥2 cm且<5 cm的亚组(HR 1.08,95% CI 0.99 - 1.18)中,DFS的合并HRs对乳房切除术组或BCT组均无优势。接受BCT的患者5年OS从70%降至68%。本荟萃分析表明,对于肿瘤较大的早期乳腺癌患者,与BCT相比,乳房切除术可能在OS方面提供轻微获益,但绝对生存获益较小。