Webster Lynn, Hjelmström Peter, Sumner Michael, Gunderson Erik W
a PRA Health Sciences , Salt Lake City , Utah , USA.
b Orexo AB , Uppsala , Sweden.
J Addict Dis. 2016 Oct-Dec;35(4):325-338. doi: 10.1080/10550887.2016.1195608. Epub 2016 Jun 7.
This prospective, randomized, active-controlled, non-inferiority study evaluated the efficacy and safety of a sublingual buprenorphine/naloxone rapidly dissolving tablet (Zubsolv; buprenorphine/naloxone rapidly dissolving tablet) versus generic buprenorphine for induction of opioid maintenance among dependent adults. The study, conducted at 13 sites from June 2013 to January 2014, included a 2-day blinded induction phase and a 27-day open-label stabilization/maintenance phase. During the blinded induction, patients received fixed doses of buprenorphine/naloxone rapidly dissolving tablets or generic buprenorphine. During open-label stabilization/early maintenance, all patients received buprenorphine/naloxone rapidly dissolving tablets. The primary efficacy assessment was treatment retention at day 3; buprenorphine/naloxone rapidly dissolving tablets were considered non-inferior to generic buprenorphine if the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval for the difference between the treatments was ≥-10% in patients retained on day 3. Secondary assessments included opioid withdrawal symptoms and cravings as measured using the Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale, the Subjective Opiate Withdrawal Scale, and the opioid cravings visual analogue scale. Safety was also assessed. A total of 313 patients were randomly assigned to induction with generic buprenorphine or buprenorphine/naloxone rapidly dissolving tablets. The mean age was 38.4 years, and the mean duration of opioid dependence was 12.4 years. For the primary efficacy assessment, 235 of 256 patients (91.8%) were retained at day 3 and continued to the maintenance phase. The lower limit of the 95% confidence interval was -13.7; thus, buprenorphine/naloxone rapidly dissolving tablets did not demonstrate non-inferiority to generic buprenorphine, and significantly more patients who received induction with generic buprenorphine (122/128 [95.3%]) were retained at day 3 compared with those who received induction with buprenorphine/naloxone rapidly dissolving tablets (113/128 [88.3%]; 95% confidence interval: -13.7, -0.4; p = 0.040). The rates of clinical response, as measured by the Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale, the Subjective Opiate Withdrawal Scale, and the visual analogue scale, were comparable among patients regardless of the induction medication. Treatment with buprenorphine/naloxone rapidly dissolving tablets was generally safe and reduced the severity of withdrawal symptoms and cravings.
这项前瞻性、随机、活性药物对照、非劣效性研究评估了舌下含服丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮速溶片(Zubsolv;丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮速溶片)与普通丁丙诺啡在阿片类药物依赖成年患者中诱导维持治疗的疗效和安全性。该研究于2013年6月至2014年1月在13个地点进行,包括一个为期2天的盲法诱导期和一个为期27天的开放标签稳定/维持期。在盲法诱导期间,患者接受固定剂量的丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮速溶片或普通丁丙诺啡。在开放标签稳定/早期维持期间,所有患者均接受丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮速溶片。主要疗效评估指标为第3天的治疗保留率;如果治疗组间差异的95%置信区间下限≥-10%,则认为丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮速溶片不劣于普通丁丙诺啡。次要评估指标包括使用临床阿片戒断量表、主观阿片戒断量表和阿片类药物渴求视觉模拟量表测量的阿片戒断症状和渴求。同时也评估了安全性。共有313例患者被随机分配接受普通丁丙诺啡或丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮速溶片诱导治疗。平均年龄为38.4岁,阿片类药物依赖的平均时长为12.4年。对于主要疗效评估,256例患者中有235例(91.8%)在第3天被保留并进入维持期。95%置信区间下限为-13.7;因此,丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮速溶片未显示出不劣于普通丁丙诺啡,并且与接受丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮速溶片诱导治疗的患者(113/128 [88.3%];95%置信区间:-13.7,-0.4;p = 0.040)相比,接受普通丁丙诺啡诱导治疗的患者在第3天被保留的显著更多(122/128 [95.3%])。无论诱导用药如何,根据临床阿片戒断量表、主观阿片戒断量表和视觉模拟量表测量的临床反应率在患者中相当。丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮速溶片治疗总体安全,可减轻戒断症状和渴求的严重程度。