Grober Ellen, Mowrey Wenzhu Bi, Ehrlich Amy R, Mabie Peter, Hahn Steven, Lipton Richard B
a Department of Neurology , Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore Medical Center , Bronx , NY , USA.
b Department of Epidemiology and Population Health , Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore Medical Center , Bronx , NY , USA.
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2016 Nov;38(9):1038-49. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2016.1187117. Epub 2016 Jun 7.
The objective was to compare two screening strategies for dementia in an urban primary care clinic, serving a low-education, minority community composed largely of Latino and African American patients.
Two hundred and fifty-seven patients underwent two-stage patient-based screening (PBS) and informant-based screening (IBS) followed by a diagnostic evaluation. In the first stage, PBS included brief tests of episodic memory (Memory Impairment Screen), semantic memory (Animal Fluency), and executive function (Reciting Months Backwards). For IBS, the first stage consisted of the short Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly, administered to a family member or friend. Patients who screened positive in the first stage of either strategy underwent testing with the picture version of the Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test with Immediate Recall to identify memory impairment. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were computed for various cutoffs of each test and combination of tests. Dementia was diagnosed using Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) criteria without access to the screening test results.
We identified 66 patients (25.7%) with previously undiagnosed dementia. Sensitivity was the same (77%) for both strategies but specificity was higher for IBS than for PBS (92% versus 83%). IBS's higher specificity makes it the preferred strategy if a knowledgeable informant is available.
Unrecognized dementia is common in primary care. Case-finding can be improved using either PBS or IBS two-stage screening strategies.
比较在一家城市初级保健诊所中针对痴呆症的两种筛查策略,该诊所服务于一个低教育水平、以拉丁裔和非裔美国患者为主的少数族裔社区。
257名患者接受了两阶段的基于患者的筛查(PBS)和基于 informant 的筛查(IBS),随后进行诊断评估。在第一阶段,PBS 包括情景记忆(记忆损害筛查)、语义记忆(动物流畅性)和执行功能(倒背月份)的简短测试。对于 IBS,第一阶段包括向家庭成员或朋友发放简短的《老年人认知衰退 informant 问卷》。在任何一种策略的第一阶段筛查呈阳性的患者接受了带有即时回忆的图片版自由和线索选择性提醒测试,以确定记忆损害。计算了每种测试及测试组合在不同临界值下的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值。使用《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)标准诊断痴呆症,且不参考筛查测试结果。
我们识别出66名(25.7%)先前未被诊断出痴呆症的患者。两种策略的敏感性相同(77%),但 IBS 的特异性高于 PBS(分别为92%和83%)。如果有知识渊博的 informant,IBS 较高的特异性使其成为首选策略。
在初级保健中,未被识别的痴呆症很常见。使用 PBS 或 IBS 两阶段筛查策略可改善病例发现情况。