Borck Cornelius
Med Hist. 2016 Jul;60(3):308-24. doi: 10.1017/mdh.2016.25.
A recent paper famously accused the rising field of social neuroscience of using faulty statistics under the catchy title 'Voodoo Correlations in Social Neuroscience'. This Special Issue invites us to take this claim as the starting point for a cross-cultural analysis: in which meaningful ways can recent research in the burgeoning field of functional imaging be described as, contrasted with, or simply compared to animistic practices? And what light does such a reading shed on the dynamics and effectiveness of a century of brain research into higher mental functions? Reviewing the heated debate from 2009 around recent trends in neuroimaging as a possible candidate for current instances of 'soul catching', the paper will then compare these forms of primarily image-based brain research with older regimes, revolving around the deciphering of the brain's electrical activity. How has the move from a decoding paradigm to a representational regime affected the conceptualisation of self, psyche, mind and soul (if there still is such an entity)? And in what ways does modern technoscience provide new tools for animating brains?
最近有一篇论文,标题为《社会神经科学中的巫毒关联》,十分引人注目,它指责新兴的社会神经科学领域使用了有缺陷的统计方法。本期特刊邀请我们以这一观点为出发点进行跨文化分析:在哪些有意义的方面,新兴的功能成像领域的最新研究可以被描述为与万物有灵论的实践形成对比,或者仅仅是进行比较?这样的解读能为一个世纪以来对高级心理功能的大脑研究的动态变化和有效性带来怎样的启示?回顾2009年围绕神经成像最新趋势展开的激烈辩论,神经成像可能是当前“捕捉灵魂”实例的一个候选领域,本文随后将把这些主要基于图像的大脑研究形式与围绕解读大脑电活动的旧有模式进行比较。从解码范式到表征模式的转变如何影响了对自我、心理、心智和灵魂(如果仍然存在这样一个实体)的概念化?现代技术科学又以何种方式为激活大脑提供了新工具?