Hansenová Maňásková Silvie, van Belkum Alex, Endtz Hubert P, Bikker Floris J, Veerman Enno C I, van Wamel Willem J B
Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Oral Biochemistry, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amsterdam and VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Chief Scientific Office, BioMérieux, La Balme les Grottes, France.
J Immunol Methods. 2016 Sep;436:29-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2016.06.003. Epub 2016 Jun 11.
Multiplex bead-based flow cytometry is an attractive way for simultaneous, rapid and cost-effective analysis of multiple analytes in a single sample. Previously, we developed various bead-based assays using non-magnetic beads coated with Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae antigens for the detection of antibodies. Here, we compared the performance of the assay using non-magnetic beads with one based on the newly developed magnetic beads. We optimized the magnetic beads' coupling procedure and antibody detection assays for S. aureus and S. pneumoniae antigens and we measured IgG in human pooled serum against a series of S. aureus and S. pneumoniae-derived antigens in a singleplex and in a multiplex assay, respectively. For the multiplex assay, the comparison between magnetic and non-magnetic beads showed: i) in the majority of the cases (13 of the 17 tested S. pneumoniae antigens) significantly higher Median Fluorescence Intensity (MFI) values, ii) lower detection limits, iii) lower coefficient of variation (CV: 12% vs. 7% for non-magnetic vs. magnetic beads), so lower inter-assay variation and hence higher reproducibility. Magnetic bead coupling is cost effective, as we used 25% of the normal amount of antigen and only 50% of the beads in comparison to the non-magnetic beads. This optimized magnetic-based assay, which combines ease of use with an improved assay performance, allows detection of antibodies with a low titer that are potentially missed with the non-magnetic-based assay.
基于多重微珠的流式细胞术是一种极具吸引力的方法,可对单个样本中的多种分析物进行同时、快速且经济高效的分析。此前,我们开发了各种基于微珠的检测方法,使用包被有金黄色葡萄球菌和肺炎链球菌抗原的非磁性微珠来检测抗体。在此,我们比较了使用非磁性微珠的检测方法与基于新开发的磁性微珠的检测方法的性能。我们优化了磁性微珠的偶联程序以及针对金黄色葡萄球菌和肺炎链球菌抗原的抗体检测方法,并分别在单重检测和多重检测中测量了人混合血清中针对一系列金黄色葡萄球菌和肺炎链球菌衍生抗原的IgG。对于多重检测,磁性微珠和非磁性微珠之间的比较显示:i)在大多数情况下(17种测试的肺炎链球菌抗原中的13种),中位荧光强度(MFI)值显著更高;ii)检测限更低;iii)变异系数更低(非磁性微珠与磁性微珠的变异系数分别为12%和7%),因此批间变异更低,重复性更高。与非磁性微珠相比,磁性微珠偶联具有成本效益,因为我们使用的抗原量仅为正常量的25%,微珠量仅为50%。这种经过优化的基于磁性的检测方法,兼具易用性和改进的检测性能,能够检测出非磁性检测方法可能遗漏的低滴度抗体。