Suppr超能文献

接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后再灌注的ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者转回转诊医院:加拿大地区ST段抬高型心肌梗死护理系统的见解

Repatriation to referral hospital after reperfusion of STEMI patients transferred for primary percutaneous coronary intervention: Insights of a Canadian regional STEMI care system.

作者信息

Ting Rudee, Tejpal Ambika, Finken Laura, Fisher Mark, Lefkowitz Charles, Parthasarathy Harikrishnan, Fallis Brooks, Fosbol Emil L, Al-Shehri Mohammad, Kutryk Michael, Buller Christopher E, Fam Neil, Graham John J, Cheema Asim N, Bagai Akshay

机构信息

Terrence Donnelly Heart Centre, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

St. Joseph's Health Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Am Heart J. 2016 Jul;177:145-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2016.04.017. Epub 2016 Apr 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In regional systems of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) care, patients presenting to hospitals without percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are transferred to PCI-capable hospitals for primary PCI. Repatriation, a practice whereby such patients are transferred back to non-PCI referral hospitals after reperfusion is prevalent in many jurisdictions, yet little is known of this practice and its safety.

METHODS

We studied 979 consecutive STEMI patients transported from the emergency department and catchment area of two non-PCI hospitals in Ontario, Canada to a regional PCI-hospital for primary PCI between January 2008 and June 2014. Logistic regression modeling was performed to determine factors associated with delayed repatriation beyond 24 hours and to evaluate the association between repatriation and index-admission mortality.

RESULTS

Eight hundred and fifteen (83.2%) patients were repatriated with 524 (65.2%) patients repatriated within 24 hours. Factors independently associated with delayed repatriation included systolic blood pressure (OR 1.03 per 5 mmHg decrease, 95% CI 1.01-1.06, P= .04), requirement for mechanical ventilation (OR 24.9, 95% CI 5.4-115.3, P< .0001), ventricular arrhythmia (OR 3.0, 95% CI 1.3-6.6, P= .01), infarct-related artery (P= .03), final TIMI flow grade (P= .01) and access-site complications (OR 2.36, 95% CI 1.04-5.4, P= .04). After repatriation, 9 (1.3%) patients returned to the PCI-hospital for urgent care, and 16 (2.0%) died during index-admission. After adjustment, repatriation was not associated with increase in index-admission mortality (adjusted OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.16-1.32, P= .15).

CONCLUSIONS

In a regional STEMI care system in Ontario, Canada, patients are routinely repatriated to non-PCI hospitals after primary PCI. This practice was associated with very low and acceptable rate of return to the PCI-hospital during index-admission without an adverse impact on short-term outcomes.

摘要

背景

在ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)区域护理系统中,就诊于无经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)能力医院的患者会被转至具备PCI能力的医院进行直接PCI。患者再灌注后转回非PCI转诊医院的做法(即遣返)在许多辖区都很普遍,但对这种做法及其安全性知之甚少。

方法

我们研究了2008年1月至2014年6月期间从加拿大安大略省两家非PCI医院的急诊科及服务区域转运至一家区域PCI医院进行直接PCI的979例连续性STEMI患者。进行逻辑回归建模以确定与延迟遣返超过24小时相关的因素,并评估遣返与首次入院死亡率之间的关联。

结果

815例(83.2%)患者被遣返,其中524例(65.2%)患者在24小时内被遣返。与延迟遣返独立相关的因素包括收缩压(每降低5 mmHg的比值比为1.03,95%置信区间为1.01 - 1.06,P = 0.04)、机械通气需求(比值比为24.9,95%置信区间为5.4 - 115.3,P < 0.0001)、室性心律失常(比值比为3.0,95%置信区间为1.3 - 6.6,P = 0.01)、梗死相关动脉(P = 0.03)、最终TIMI血流分级(P = 0.01)及穿刺部位并发症(比值比为2.36,95%置信区间为1.04 - 5.4,P = 0.04)。遣返后,9例(1.3%)患者返回PCI医院接受紧急治疗,16例(2.0%)患者在首次入院期间死亡。调整后,遣返与首次入院死亡率增加无关(调整后的比值比为0.46,95%置信区间为0.16 - 1.32,P = 0.15)。

结论

在加拿大安大略省的一个区域STEMI护理系统中,患者在直接PCI后通常会被遣返回非PCI医院。这种做法与首次入院期间返回PCI医院的比率非常低且可接受,并且对短期结局没有不利影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验