Suppr超能文献

非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌的诊断与治疗:AUA/SUO 指南。

Diagnosis and Treatment of Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer: AUA/SUO Guideline.

机构信息

American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc., Linthicum, Maryland.

出版信息

J Urol. 2016 Oct;196(4):1021-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.06.049. Epub 2016 Jun 16.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Although associated with an overall favorable survival rate, the heterogeneity of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) affects patients' rates of recurrence and progression. Risk stratification should influence evaluation, treatment and surveillance. This guideline attempts to provide a clinical framework for the management of NMIBC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review utilized research from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) and additional supplementation by the authors and consultant methodologists. Evidence-based statements were based on body of evidence strength Grade A, B, or C and were designated as Strong, Moderate, and Conditional Recommendations with additional statements presented in the form of Clinical Principles or Expert Opinions.(1) RESULTS: A risk-stratified approach categorizes patients into broad groups of low-, intermediate-, and high-risk. Importantly, the evaluation and treatment algorithm takes into account tumor characteristics and uniquely considers a patient's response to therapy. The 38 statements vary in level of evidence, but none include Grade A evidence, and many were Grade C.

CONCLUSION

The intensity and scope of care for NMIBC should focus on patient, disease, and treatment response characteristics. This guideline attempts to improve a clinician's ability to evaluate and treat each patient, but higher quality evidence in future trials will be essential to improve level of care for these patients.

摘要

目的

尽管非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌(NMIBC)总体生存率较好,但肿瘤异质性会影响患者的复发和进展率。风险分层应影响评估、治疗和监测。本指南旨在为 NMIBC 的管理提供临床框架。

材料和方法

系统评价利用了美国医疗保健研究与质量局(AHRQ)的研究,并由作者和顾问方法学家进行了额外补充。基于证据体强度等级 A、B 或 C 的循证声明被指定为强、中等和有条件推荐,此外还以临床原则或专家意见的形式提出了其他声明。(1)结果:风险分层方法将患者分为低风险、中风险和高风险三大类。重要的是,评估和治疗方案考虑了肿瘤特征,并专门考虑了患者对治疗的反应。38 条声明的证据水平不同,但均无 A 级证据,其中许多为 C 级。

结论

NMIBC 的护理强度和范围应集中在患者、疾病和治疗反应特征上。本指南旨在提高临床医生评估和治疗每位患者的能力,但未来试验中更高质量的证据对于提高这些患者的护理水平至关重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验