Baysari Melissa T, Lehnbom Elin C, Li Ling, Hargreaves Andrew, Day Richard O, Westbrook Johanna I
Centre for Health Systems & Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia; Department of Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Int J Med Inform. 2016 Aug;92:15-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.04.008. Epub 2016 Apr 30.
To review evidence of the effectiveness of information technology (IT) interventions to improve antimicrobial prescribing in hospitals.
MEDLINE (1950-March 2015), EMBASE (1947-March 2015) and PubMED (1966-March 2015) were searched for studies where an IT intervention involving any device (e.g. computer, mobile phone) was evaluated in practice. All papers were assessed for quality using a 10-point rating scale.
We identified 45 articles that evaluated an IT intervention to improve antimicrobial prescribing in hospitals. IT interventions took four main forms: (1) stand-alone computerized decision support systems (CDSSs), (2) decision support embedded within a hospital's electronic medical record (EMR) or computerized provider order entry (CPOE) system, (3) computerized antimicrobial approval systems (cAAS), and (4) surveillance systems (SSs). Results reported allowed us to perform meta-analyses for three outcome measures: appropriate use of antimicrobials, patient mortality and hospital length of stay (LOS). IT interventions increased appropriate use of antimicrobials (pooled RR: 1.49, 95%CI: 1.07-2.08); however no evidence of an effect was found when analysis included only studies with a quality score of five or above on the 10-point quality scale (pooled RR: 1.53, 95%CI: 0.96-2.44). There was little evidence of an effect of IT interventions on patient mortality or LOS. The range of study designs and outcome measures prevented meaningful comparisons between different IT intervention types to be made.
IT interventions can improve the appropriateness of antimicrobial prescribing. However, high quality, systematic multi-site comparative studies are critically needed to assist organizations in making informed decisions about the most effective IT interventions.
回顾信息技术(IT)干预措施在改善医院抗菌药物处方方面有效性的证据。
检索MEDLINE(1950年 - 2015年3月)、EMBASE(1947年 - 2015年3月)和PubMED(1966年 - 2015年3月),查找在实际应用中对涉及任何设备(如计算机、手机)的IT干预措施进行评估的研究。所有论文使用10分制评分量表评估质量。
我们确定了45篇评估IT干预措施以改善医院抗菌药物处方的文章。IT干预措施主要有四种形式:(1)独立的计算机化决策支持系统(CDSS),(2)嵌入医院电子病历(EMR)或计算机化医嘱录入(CPOE)系统中的决策支持,(3)计算机化抗菌药物审批系统(cAAS),以及(4)监测系统(SS)。报告的结果使我们能够对三项结果指标进行荟萃分析:抗菌药物的合理使用、患者死亡率和住院时间(LOS)。IT干预措施增加了抗菌药物的合理使用(合并相对危险度:1.49,95%置信区间:1.07 - 2.08);然而,当分析仅包括在10分质量量表上质量得分在5分或以上的研究时,未发现有效果的证据(合并相对危险度:1.53,95%置信区间:0.96 - 2.44)。几乎没有证据表明IT干预措施对患者死亡率或住院时间有影响。研究设计和结果指标的范围使得不同IT干预类型之间无法进行有意义的比较。
IT干预措施可以提高抗菌药物处方的合理性。然而,迫切需要高质量、系统的多中心比较研究,以帮助各机构就最有效的IT干预措施做出明智决策。