Suppr超能文献

双相情感障碍、边缘性人格障碍患者及其共病表现中的情绪调节障碍。

Emotional dysregulation in those with bipolar disorder, borderline personality disorder and their comorbid expression.

作者信息

Bayes Adam, Parker Gordon, McClure Georgia

机构信息

School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, NSW, Australia.

School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, NSW, Australia; Black Dog Institute, Hospital Rd, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia.

出版信息

J Affect Disord. 2016 Nov 1;204:103-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.06.027. Epub 2016 Jun 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Differentiation of the bipolar disorders (BP) from a borderline personality disorder (BPD) can be challenging owing to shared features, with emotional dysregulation being the likely principal one.

AIM

To assess differences in emotion regulation strategies in those with BP alone, BPD alone and those comorbid for both.

METHODS

We interviewed participants previously receiving a BP or BPD diagnosis, studying those who met DSM criteria for one or both conditions.

RESULTS

The sample comprised 83 with bipolar disorder, 53 with BPD and 54 comorbid for both. Analyses established linear trends, with the greatest impairment in emotion regulation strategies in the comorbid group followed by the BPD group, and with the lowest in the BP group. Specific deficits in the comorbid group included impulsivity, difficulties with goal directed behaviour, and accessing strategies. A similar linear profile was quantified for maladaptive cognitive emotion regulation strategies, weighted to catastrophizing and rumination. Adaptive emotion regulation strategies were superior in the bipolar group, without significant differences observed between the comorbid and BPD groups.

LIMITATIONS

Reliance on self-report measures; combined BP I and II participants limits generalisability of results to each bipolar sub-type; use of DSM diagnoses risking artefactual comorbidity; while there was an over-representation of females in all groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Differences in emotion regulation strategies advance differentiation of those with either BP or BPD, while we identify the specificity of differing strategies to each condition and their synergic effect in those comorbid for both conditions. Study findings should assist the development and application of targeted strategies for those with either or both conditions.

摘要

背景

双相情感障碍(BP)与边缘型人格障碍(BPD)的鉴别诊断具有挑战性,因为两者存在共同特征,其中情绪调节障碍可能是主要的共同特征。

目的

评估单纯双相情感障碍患者、单纯边缘型人格障碍患者以及双相情感障碍与边缘型人格障碍共病患者在情绪调节策略上的差异。

方法

我们对之前被诊断为双相情感障碍或边缘型人格障碍的参与者进行了访谈,研究对象为符合一种或两种疾病DSM标准的患者。

结果

样本包括83例双相情感障碍患者、53例边缘型人格障碍患者和54例双相情感障碍与边缘型人格障碍共病患者。分析确定了线性趋势,共病组在情绪调节策略方面受损最严重,其次是边缘型人格障碍组,双相情感障碍组受损最轻。共病组的具体缺陷包括冲动性、目标导向行为困难和策略运用困难。对适应不良的认知情绪调节策略进行了类似的线性分析,重点关注灾难化思维和反复思考。双相情感障碍组的适应性情绪调节策略更优,共病组和边缘型人格障碍组之间未观察到显著差异。

局限性

依赖自我报告测量;将双相情感障碍I型和II型患者合并,限制了研究结果对每种双相情感障碍亚型的普遍性;使用DSM诊断可能存在人为共病情况;所有组中女性比例过高。

结论

情绪调节策略的差异有助于鉴别双相情感障碍患者和边缘型人格障碍患者,同时我们确定了每种疾病不同策略的特异性及其在两种疾病共病患者中的协同作用。研究结果应有助于为患有其中一种或两种疾病的患者制定和应用针对性策略。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验