Instituto de Recursos Naturales y Agrobiología de Sevilla, CSIC, Av. Reina Mercedes, 10, 41012 Sevilla, Spain.
Area Producción Agraria, IFAPA, Av. Menéndez Pidal s/n, Campus Alameda del Obispo, 14004 Córdoba, Spain.
Sci Total Environ. 2016 Nov 1;569-570:416-422. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.06.126. Epub 2016 Jun 25.
Occurrences of surface water contamination by herbicides in areas where olive orchards are established reveal a need to understand soil processes affecting herbicide fate at field scale for this popular Mediterranean crop. A monitoring study with two herbicides (terbuthylazine and oxyfluorfen) in the first 2cm of soil, runoff waters, and sediments, was carried out after under natural rainfall conditions following winter herbicide application. At the end of the 107day field experiment, no residues of the soil applied terbuthylazine were recovered, whereas 42% of the oxyfluorfen applied remained in the top soil. Very low levels of both herbicides were measured in runoff waters; however, concentrations were slightly higher for terbuthylazine (0.53% of applied) than for oxyfluorfen (0.03% of applied), relating to their respective water solubilities. Congruent with soil residue data, 38.15% of the applied oxyfluorfen was found in runoff-sediment, compared to only 0.46% for terbuthylazine. Accordingly, the herbicide soil distribution coefficients measured within runoff field tanks was much greater for oxyfluorfen (Kd=3098) than for terbuthylazine (Kd=1.57). The herbicide oxyfluorfen is co-transported with sediment in runoff, remaining trapped and/or adsorbed to soil particle aggregates, due in part to its low water solubility. In contrast, terbuthylazine soil dissipation may be associated more so with leaching processes, favored by its high water solubility, low sorption, and slow degradation. By comparing these two herbicides, our results reaffirm the importance of herbicide physico-chemical properties in dictating their behavior in soil and also suggest that herbicides with low solubility, as seen in the case oxyfluorfen, remain susceptible to offsite transport associated with sediments.
在橄榄园种植区地表水遭受除草剂污染的现象表明,需要了解影响该地中海地区流行作物田间除草剂命运的土壤过程。在冬季施药后自然降雨条件下,进行了一项为期 107 天的田间试验,监测了土壤(前 2cm)、径流水和沉积物中两种除草剂(特丁津和草氟灵)的含量。试验结束时,未检测到施用于土壤的特丁津残留,而施用于表层土壤的草氟灵仍有 42%残留。在径流水中有非常低水平的两种除草剂检出;然而,特丁津的浓度(施用量的 0.53%)略高于草氟灵(施用量的 0.03%),这与它们各自的水溶性有关。与土壤残留数据一致,在径流水-沉积物中发现 38.15%的施用量草氟灵,而特丁津只有 0.46%。因此,在径流水田间罐中测得的除草剂土壤分配系数,草氟灵(Kd=3098)远大于特丁津(Kd=1.57)。草氟灵与沉积物一起在径流中共同迁移,由于其低水溶性,被截留和/或吸附到土壤颗粒聚集体上。相比之下,特丁津的土壤消散可能与淋溶过程有关,这得益于其高水溶性、低吸附性和缓慢降解性。通过比较这两种除草剂,我们的结果再次证实了除草剂物理化学性质在决定其在土壤中行为方面的重要性,并表明像草氟灵这样低水溶性的除草剂仍容易受到与沉积物相关的场外迁移的影响。