El-Hennawy Hany, Stratta Robert J, Smith Fowler
Hany El-Hennawy, Robert J Stratta, Fowler Smith, Department of Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, United States.
World J Transplant. 2016 Jun 24;6(2):255-71. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v6.i2.255.
The history of vascularized pancreas transplantation largely parallels developments in immunosuppression and technical refinements in transplant surgery. From the late-1980s to 1995, most pancreas transplants were whole organ pancreatic grafts with insulin delivery to the iliac vein and diversion of the pancreatic ductal secretions to the urinary bladder (systemic-bladder technique). The advent of bladder drainage revolutionized the safety and improved the success of pancreas transplantation. However, starting in 1995, a seismic change occurred from bladder to bowel exocrine drainage coincident with improvements in immunosuppression, preservation techniques, diagnostic monitoring, general medical care, and the success and frequency of enteric conversion. In the new millennium, pancreas transplants are performed predominantly as pancreatico-duodenal grafts with enteric diversion of the pancreatic ductal secretions coupled with iliac vein provision of insulin (systemic-enteric technique) although the systemic-bladder technique endures as a preferred alternative in selected cases. In the early 1990s, a novel technique of venous drainage into the superior mesenteric vein combined with bowel exocrine diversion (portal-enteric technique) was designed and subsequently refined over the next ≥ 20 years to re-create the natural physiology of the pancreas with first-pass hepatic processing of insulin. Enteric drainage usually refers to jejunal or ileal diversion of the exocrine secretions either with a primary enteric anastomosis or with an additional Roux limb. The portal-enteric technique has spawned a number of newer and revisited techniques of enteric exocrine drainage including duodenal or gastric diversion. Reports in the literature suggest no differences in pancreas transplant outcomes irrespective of type of either venous or exocrine diversion. The purpose of this review is to examine the literature on exocrine drainage in the new millennium (the purported "enteric drainage" era) with special attention to technical variations and nuances in vascularized pancreas transplantation that have been proposed and studied in this time period.
血管化胰腺移植的历史在很大程度上与免疫抑制的发展以及移植手术技术的改进并行。从20世纪80年代末到1995年,大多数胰腺移植是全器官胰腺移植物,胰岛素输送至髂静脉,胰管分泌物引流至膀胱(全身-膀胱技术)。膀胱引流的出现彻底改变了胰腺移植的安全性并提高了成功率。然而,从1995年开始,随着免疫抑制、保存技术、诊断监测、一般医疗护理的改善以及肠道改道的成功率和频率的提高,出现了从膀胱外分泌引流到肠道外分泌引流的重大转变。在新千年,胰腺移植主要作为胰十二指肠移植物进行,胰管分泌物通过肠道改道,同时通过髂静脉提供胰岛素(全身-肠道技术),尽管在某些特定情况下,全身-膀胱技术仍然是首选的替代方法。在20世纪90年代初,设计了一种将静脉血引流至上肠系膜静脉并结合肠道外分泌改道的新技术(门静脉-肠道技术),随后在接下来的20多年里不断完善,以重建胰腺的自然生理功能,使胰岛素能够首先通过肝脏进行处理。肠道引流通常是指通过初次肠道吻合或附加Roux袢将外分泌分泌物引流至空肠或回肠。门静脉-肠道技术催生了许多更新的和重新审视的肠道外分泌引流技术,包括十二指肠或胃改道。文献报道表明,无论静脉或外分泌改道的类型如何,胰腺移植的结果没有差异。本综述的目的是研究新千年(所谓的“肠道引流”时代)关于外分泌引流的文献,特别关注在这一时期提出和研究的血管化胰腺移植技术的变化和细微差别。